Social Networks and Social Information Filtering on Digg

Kristina Lerman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cs/0612046

2006-12-08

Abstract:The new social media sites -- blogs, wikis, Flickr and Digg, among others -- underscore the transformation of the Web to a participatory medium in which users are actively creating, evaluating and distributing information. Digg is a social news aggregator which allows users to submit links to, vote on and discuss news stories. Each day Digg selects a handful of stories to feature on its front page. Rather than rely on the opinion of a few editors, Digg aggregates opinions of thousands of its users to decide which stories to promote to the front page. Digg users can designate other users as ``friends'' and easily track friends' activities: what new stories they submitted, commented on or read. The friends interface acts as a \emph{social filtering} system, recommending to user stories his or her friends liked or found interesting. By tracking the votes received by newly submitted stories over time, we showed that social filtering is an effective information filtering approach. Specifically, we showed that (a) users tend to like stories submitted by friends and (b) users tend to like stories their friends read and liked. As a byproduct of social filtering, social networks also play a role in promoting stories to Digg's front page, potentially leading to ``tyranny of the minority'' situation where a disproportionate number of front page stories comes from the same small group of interconnected users. Despite this, social filtering is a promising new technology that can be used to personalize and tailor information to individual users: for example, through personal front pages.

Human-Computer Interaction,Artificial Intelligence,Information Retrieval

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore how social networks affect the effectiveness of information filtering and personalized recommendation in Digg, a social news aggregation website. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **The Role of Social Networks in Digg**: The paper analyzes how Digg users track the activities of other users, such as submitted stories, comments, and votes, by establishing "friend" relationships. These social networks not only help users discover interesting content but also influence which stories will be promoted to Digg's front page.

2. **The Effectiveness of Social Filtering**: Researchers have proven through data analysis that social filtering is an effective information filtering method. Specifically:
- Users tend to like the stories submitted by their friends.
- Users also tend to like the stories that their friends have read and liked.

3. **The Influence of Social Networks on Story Promotion**: The paper points out that social networks play an important role in determining which stories are promoted to Digg's front page. This may lead to the phenomenon of "the tyranny of the minority", that is, a large number of front - page stories come from a small group of interconnected active users.

4. **Comparison with Reddit**: The paper also compares Digg's social filtering mechanism with Reddit's collaborative filtering mechanism. The results show that Digg's social filtering mechanism is more effective in screening high - quality content, while Reddit allows more unpopular stories to appear on the front page.

5. **The Impact of Algorithm Adjustment**: The paper also discusses the adjustments made by Digg to the story promotion algorithm in order to reduce the phenomenon of "the tyranny of the minority". These adjustments aim to increase the diversity of front - page content but may bring some unexpected consequences, such as reducing users' enthusiasm for joining social networks.

In conclusion, through empirical research, this paper explores the effectiveness and potential problems of social networks as information filtering and personalized recommendation tools in Digg and conducts a comparative analysis with other similar platforms.