Abstract:Security protocols are distributed programs designed to ensure secure communication in a network controlled by an adversary. They are widely used today for securing on-line services such as personal communication and electronic voting. Their design is notoriously error-prone, and a great deal of research has been devoted to their analysis. In this thesis we provide two main contributions towards the automated analysis of such protocols: algorithms for the symbolic analysis of equivalence properties, and a symbolic probabilistic framework for security protocol analysis. We consider the problem of verifying two equivalence properties relevant in protocol analysis: static equivalence and trace equivalence. Both notions model the property that an attacker cannot distinguish between two protocol executions, and they have been used to model security goals such as off-line guessing, electronic voting anonymity, and RFID untraceability. Static equivalence is concerned with an attacker who passively eavesdrop on a network and then tries to distinguish between possible executions by performing off-line computations. Trace equivalence is used in the analysis of security properties against an attacker who may participate actively in protocol execution. We present an efficient decision procedure for static equivalence under equational theories generated by subterm convergent rewriting systems. This class of theories encompasses the most common cryptographic primitives, including symmetric and asymmetric encryption and decryption, hash functions and digital signatures. Our algorithm achieves a better asymptotic complexity than competing algorithms, albeit with a narrower scope. We discuss its implementation in the FAST tool and show that it indeed performs much more efficiently than other existing tools for the same task. We also present a procedure for deciding the trace equivalence of bounded simple processes under equational theories generated by convergent rewriting systems and for which a finitary unification algorithm exists. Although we do not have a termination result, our procedure is correct for the largest class of equational theories handled by any existing procedure for deciding trace equivalence and, together with the work by Cheval et. al [64], it is the only one to handle non-trivial else branches. Finally, we introduce a symbolic probabilistic framework for the analysis of security protocols. Our framework provides a general method for expressing weak-

Photon counting statistics using a digital oscilloscope

Automated Composition of Security Protocols

Composing security protocols: from confidentiality to privacy

A method for symbolic analysis of security protocols

Practical and Scalable Security Verification of Secure Architectures

A Generic Methodology for the Modular Verification of Security Protocol Implementations (extended version)

Formal Analysis of Composable DeFi Protocols

All graph state verification protocols are composably secure

A Formal Specification and Verification Framework for Timed Security Protocols.

Dynamic epistemic verification of security protocols: framework and case study

Sound Verification of Security Protocols: From Design to Interoperable Implementations (extended version)

DeepSec: Deciding Equivalence Properties for Security Protocols -- Improved theory and practice

Equivalence Properties and Probabilistic Reasoning in Symbolic Security Protocol Analysis

Degrees of Security: Protocol Guarantees in the Face of Compromising Adversaries

Composing Quantum Protocols in a Classical Environment

A Security Calculus of Concurrent Objects for Verifying Ad Hoc Network Protocols

Advancing Security Protocol Verification: A Comparative Study of Scyther, Tamarin

User-Guided Verification of Security Protocols via Sound Animation

A Security Verification Framework of Cryptographic Protocols Using Machine Learning

Formal Verification of Quantum Protocols

Event-based Compositional Reasoning of Information-Flow Security for Concurrent Systems.