Abstract:We report tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) ratios as high as 472% at room temperature and 804% at 5 K in pseudo-spin valve (SV) CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) annealed at 450oC, which is approaching the theoretically predicted value. By contrast, the TMR ratios for exchange-biased (EB) SV MTJs with a MnIr antiferromagnetic layer are found to drop when they are annealed at 450oC. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis shows that annealing at 450oC induces interdiffusion of Mn and Ru atoms into the MgO barrier and ferromagnetic layers in EB-SV MTJs. Mechanisms behind the different annealing behavior are discussed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is why the star - formation process is so slow. Specifically, giant molecular clouds (GMCs) convert only a small fraction of gas into stars within the free - fall time, and this low star - formation rate is constant on a wide range of scales from individual clustered molecular clouds within the Milky Way to entire star - burst galaxies. This phenomenon is known as the "100 - fold discrepancy in star formation", that is, the actually observed star - formation rate is approximately 100 times lower than theoretically expected.
### Problem Background
Zuckerman & Evans (1974) first pointed out that one of the most astonishing facts about star formation is that it is very slow. For example, there is approximately \( M_{\text{mol}} \approx 10^9 M_\odot \) of molecular gas within the solar circle. These gases are organized into giant molecular clouds (GMCs) with a typical density of about \( 100 \, \text{H atoms} \, \text{cm}^{-3} \) and a free - fall time of about \( t_{\text{ff}} \approx 4 \, \text{Myr} \). However, the star - formation rate in the Milky Way is only \( \sim 3 M_\odot \, \text{yr}^{-1} \), far lower than the \( \sim 250 M_\odot \, \text{yr}^{-1} \) expected if the molecular clouds were to convert all their mass into stars within their free - fall time.
### Main Points of the Paper
The author Mark R. Krumholz proposed a model, suggesting that star formation occurs in structures in equilibrium and that its rate is regulated by supersonic turbulence. This turbulence is driven by star - formation feedback, which injects energy to counteract the radiation in isothermal shocks and keeps the star - formation structures close to equilibrium. In this way, the model can explain the observational results and cover a wide range of scales from the formation time of young star clusters to the extragalactic IR - HCN correlation.
### Core Mechanisms of the Model
1. **Regulation of Star - Formation Rate by Turbulence**:
- Krumholz & McKee (2005) proposed a simple model to determine the star - formation rate based on the relationship between the energy of turbulent motion and the gravitational potential energy.
- In a supersonic turbulent isothermal medium, there are two universal properties: the line - width - scale relationship and the log - normal density distribution.
- These properties determine that in a given sub - region, when the density exceeds a certain critical value, the gravitational potential energy will be greater than the turbulent kinetic energy, causing these regions to collapse and form stars within the free - fall time.
- The star - formation rate \( \text{SFR}_{\text{ff}} \) can be expressed in terms of the dimensionless cloud Mach number \( M \) and the virialization ratio \( \alpha_{\text{vir}} \):
\[
\text{SFR}_{\text{ff}} \approx 0.073 \alpha_{\text{vir}}^{-0.68} M^{-0.32}
\]
2. **Origin of Turbulence**:
- Simulation studies have shown that if not continuously driven, supersonic turbulence will decay on a time scale much shorter than the estimated GMC lifetime from observations.
- In order to maintain the turbulence and keep the GMC in an approximately equilibrium state, there must be some mechanism to drive the turbulence.
- Krumholz et al. constructed a semi - analytical model to study the global energy balance of GMCs and found that star - formation feedback (such as the generation of HII regions) can well explain the observed GMC properties.
### Summary
Feedback - driven turbulence provides a simple and natural explanation for many observational results regarding star formation. By calculating the proportion of the bound mass in turbulent, equilibrium objects, the star - formation rate predicted by the model is consistent with the observational data, including the star - formation rate in dense gases, the star - formation rate and radial distribution in the Milky Way, Kennicutt's law, and the extragalactic IR - HCN correlation. In addition, the turbulence itself is driven by star - formation feedback, and this driving mechanism explains the lifetime, surface density, and virial properties of GMCs in the local group of galaxies.