Downside Risk analysis applied to Hedge Funds universe

Josep Perello
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.04.079
2007-04-02
Abstract:Hedge Funds are considered as one of the portfolio management sectors which shows a fastest growing for the past decade. An optimal Hedge Fund management requires an appropriate risk metrics. The classic CAPM theory and its Ratio Sharpe fail to capture some crucial aspects due to the strong non-Gaussian character of Hedge Funds statistics. A possible way out to this problem while keeping the CAPM simplicity is the so-called Downside Risk analysis. One important benefit lies in distinguishing between good and bad returns, that is: returns greater or lower than investor's goal. We revisit most popular Downside Risk indicators and provide new analytical results on them. We compute these measures by taking the Credit Suisse/Tremont Investable Hedge Fund Index Data and with the Gaussian case as a benchmark. In this way an unusual transversal lecture of the existing Downside Risk measures is provided.
Physics and Society,Risk Management
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the deficiencies of the traditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and its derived Sharpe ratio in hedge fund risk assessment. Specifically, CAPM theory assumes that asset returns follow a Gaussian distribution (normal distribution), which makes it unable to capture non - Gaussian features in hedge fund return statistics, such as violent fluctuations and strong asymmetry. ### Main problems: 1. **Non - Gaussian distribution**: The returns of hedge funds show strong non - Gaussian characteristics, with extreme volatility and strong asymmetry in price changes. These characteristics lead to high sensitivity during market crashes and a significant skew in the price distribution of trading products (such as derivatives). 2. **Distinguishing good and bad returns**: Traditional CAPM and Sharpe ratio cannot effectively distinguish returns above or below investors' targets, that is, they cannot distinguish "good" returns from "bad" returns. 3. **Limitations of risk measurement**: Due to the special nature of hedge funds, traditional risk measurement methods based on the mean - variance framework (such as CAPM) may not accurately reflect their risk characteristics. ### Solutions: To overcome these problems, the paper introduces and explores the so - called **Downside Risk Analysis**. The main advantage of this method lies in its ability to distinguish returns above and below investors' targets, thereby measuring risk more accurately. Specific contributions include: 1. **Introducing popular downside - risk indicators**: The paper introduces several common downside - risk indicators in the literature and provides new analytical results. 2. **Applying actual data**: By using Credit Suisse/Tremont investable hedge fund index data, these risk indicators are calculated and compared with the Gaussian distribution as a benchmark. 3. **Cross - domain comparison**: By applying all these downside - risk indicators to the same data set, an uncommon horizontal comparison perspective is provided, making it easier to compare the performance between different hedge fund trading styles. ### Conclusions: The paper finds that, compared with the traditional CAPM method, downside - risk analysis provides a more appropriate and comprehensive risk assessment method, especially in the investment field of hedge funds with non - Gaussian characteristics. In addition, the paper also proposes some new insights and improvement methods, such as the adjusted Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, and gain - loss ratio, etc. These methods show better applicability and accuracy in dealing with hedge fund risks.