Is there a chance that the anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background detected by COBE are an artefact of COBE's image reconstruction?

Keith S Cover
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0607484
2007-07-18
Abstract:The COBE time ordered data (TOD) was reanalysed for anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background with a novel technique that is much simpler and more robust than used in the official analysis of the COBE TOD. The technique extends the statistical concept of rejecting the null hypothesis to image reconstruction by asking if the TOD is consistent with no anisotropies outside the galactic band. If it is assumed that the instrumentation noise is ideal, as appears to be the case in the official analysis, the null hypothesis can be rejected to 28 sigma, a highly significant detection. However, the official analysis presents no information supporting the ideal noise assumption to the level required to reject the null hypothesis. The interaction of COBE's calibration error of roughly 3.0% with the brightest regions of the galactic band in combination with the reconstruction algorithm may have introduced artefacts roughly of the size and spectral signature of the 10ppm anisotropies reported by COBE. Data from follow up missions have similar problems with calibration errors that may have resulted in similar sky maps to COBE. It is pointed out that either a few hours of repetitive circular scans using the WMAP satellite or the single beam antenna of the soon-to-be-launched Planck satellite should provide definitive evidence as to the existence or non existence of the 10ppm anisotropies without the use of image reconstruction.
Astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: whether the anisotropy in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) could be caused by artifacts in the COBE satellite image reconstruction process. Specifically, the author Keith S. Cover re - analyzed the COBE time - ordered data (TOD) to evaluate whether the anisotropy detected outside the galactic plane could be artifacts introduced by factors such as image reconstruction algorithms and instrument calibration errors. The author pays special attention to the following points: 1. **Ideal noise assumption**: In the official COBE analysis, the instrument noise is assumed to be ideal noise, and the signal - to - noise ratio is improved by a large number of averages. However, the validity of this assumption has not been fully verified, especially in the case of more than 6,000 averages. A 3.0% calibration error may cause the combination of signal and noise to deviate from the ideal square root N rule. 2. **Maximum - likelihood reconstruction algorithm**: The official COBE analysis uses the maximum - likelihood reconstruction algorithm and extends it to a nonlinear form to correct for gain drift. This nonlinear processing may change the spectral characteristics of the galactic - plane signal, thereby simulating the black - body radiation characteristics of CMB anisotropy. 3. **Null - hypothesis test**: The author proposes a new statistical method to test the null hypothesis (i.e., no anisotropy outside the galactic plane). By using a modified maximum - likelihood reconstruction algorithm, the author gradually sets the pixel values far from the galactic plane to zero and calculates the $\chi^2$ value at each angle to determine whether the null hypothesis can be rejected. 4. **Spectral characteristics**: The official COBE analysis believes that the detected anisotropy has black - body spectral characteristics consistent with CMB. However, the author points out that reconstruction artifacts may also produce similar spectral characteristics, especially after a large amount of data processing. In summary, this paper aims to question the authenticity and reliability of the CMB anisotropy detected by COBE, proposes that there may be artifacts caused by image reconstruction and instrument errors, and suggests further verification of these results.