Abstract:Background: In quantitative biology, mathematical models are used to describe and analyze biological processes. The parameters of these models are usually unknown and need to be estimated from experimental data using statistical methods. In particular, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods have become increasingly popular as they allow for a rigorous analysis of parameter and prediction uncertainties without the need for assuming parameter identifiability or removing non-identifiable parameters. A broad spectrum of MCMC algorithms have been proposed, including single- and multi-chain approaches. However, selecting and tuning sampling algorithms suited for a given problem remains challenging and a comprehensive comparison of different methods is so far not available. Results: We present the results of a thorough benchmarking of state-of-the-art single- and multi-chain sampling methods, including Adaptive Metropolis, Delayed Rejection Adaptive Metropolis, Metropolis adjusted Langevin algorithm, Parallel Tempering and Parallel Hierarchical Sampling. Different initialization and adaptation schemes are considered. To ensure a comprehensive and fair comparison, we consider problems with a range of features such as bifurcations, periodical orbits, multistability of steady-state solutions and chaotic regimes. These problem properties give rise to various posterior distributions including uni- and multi-modal distributions and non-normally distributed mode tails. For an objective comparison, we developed a pipeline for the semi-automatic comparison of sampling results. Conclusion: The comparison of MCMC algorithms, initialization and adaptation schemes revealed that overall multi-chain algorithms perform better than single-chain algorithms. In some cases this performance can be further increased by using a preceding multi-start local optimization scheme. These results can inform the selection of sampling methods and the benchmark collection can serve for the evaluation of new algorithms. Furthermore, our results confirm the need to address exploration quality of MCMC chains before applying the commonly used quality measure of effective sample size to prevent false analysis conclusions.

Resampling from the past to improve on MCMC algorithms

A fast asynchronous MCMC sampler for sparse Bayesian inference

A Vine-Copula Based Adaptive Mcmc Sampler for Efficient Inference of Dynamical Systems

Convergence Speed and Approximation Accuracy of Numerical MCMC

Informed sub-sampling MCMC: approximate Bayesian inference for large datasets

Using deterministic approximations to accelerate SMC for posterior sampling

Graph-accelerated Markov Chain Monte Carlo using Approximate Samples

Neural Langevin Dynamical Sampling

Data Analysis Recipes: Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo

Iterative importance sampling with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling in robust Bayesian analysis

Dynamic MCMC Sampling

No Free Lunch for Approximate MCMC

An invitation to adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence theory

Piecewise deterministic sampling with splitting schemes

Comprehensive benchmarking of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for dynamical systems

Fast MCMC sampling for Markov jump processes and continuous time Bayesian networks

Accelerating delayed-acceptance Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms

Rate-optimal refinement strategies for local approximation MCMC

Efficient Bayesian inference for stochastic volatility models with ensemble MCMC methods

Persistent Sampling: Unleashing the Potential of Sequential Monte Carlo

Accelerating Multilevel Markov Chain Monte Carlo Using Machine Learning Models