Micro-mechanics of multi-phase ferroelectric domain structures

Johannes Rödel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.659041

2006-03-20

Abstract:High-strain piezoelectric materials are often ceramics with a complicated constitution. In particular, PZT is used with compositions near to a so-called morphotropic phase boundary, where not only different variants of the same phase (domains), but different phases may coexist. Micro-mechanical models for ferroelectric ceramics would be much more realistic, if these effects could be incorporated. In this paper, we consider the conditions of mechanical and electrical compatibility of ferroelectric domain structures. We are able to address the question of coexistence of different crystallographic phases within the very same crystallite. In general, the spontaneous strain and spontaneous polarization of different phases are not compatible. The numerical analysis of the derived relationships are susceptible to the crystallographic description of the phases in question. In this presentation, a simple analysis and analytical, composition dependent fit of strain and polarization of PZT at room temperature for available data are used. The outlined approach can be used to model the overall behavior of multi-variant and multi-phase crystallites with certain, simplified geometrical arrangements of the constituents.

Materials Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the micromechanical behavior of the multiphase structure of ferroelectric materials near the phase boundary, especially how to understand the compatibility between different crystal structures (such as tetragonal, rhombohedral and monoclinic). Specifically, the paper focuses on:

1. **Complex composition of high - strain piezoelectric materials**: These materials usually have a complex composition. Especially near the so - called "morphotropic phase boundary" (MPB), different crystal structures coexist.

2. **Compatibility issues**: Research on the mechanical and electrical compatibility between different crystal structures (such as tetragonal, rhombohedral and monoclinic). If these phases are compatible, the excellent performance of the material under the action of an external electric field or stress can be explained.

3. **Micromechanical model**: A micromechanical method is proposed to describe the deformation and polarization of the ferroelectric domain structure, and the transformation conditions between different phases are analyzed, in order to establish a more accurate model of material behavior.

### Main content of the paper

- The **Introduction** part introduces the special properties of high - strain piezoelectric materials (such as PZT) near the MPB, and the mutual transformation between different phases (tetragonal, rhombohedral, monoclinic).

- The **Spontaneous deformation and polarization** part describes in detail the material deformation and polarization caused by the phase transformation, and gives the corresponding mathematical expressions. For example, the deformation gradients of the tetragonal phase, the rhombohedral phase and the monoclinic phase are respectively:
\[
U_t=\begin{pmatrix}
\alpha_t & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \alpha_t & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \beta_t
\end{pmatrix}, \quad
U_r=\begin{pmatrix}
\alpha_r & \beta_r & \beta_r \\
\beta_r & \alpha_r & \beta_r \\
\beta_r & \beta_r & \alpha_r
\end{pmatrix}, \quad
U_m=\begin{pmatrix}
\alpha_m & 0 & \delta_m \\
0 & \beta_m & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \gamma_m
\end{pmatrix}
\]

- The **Domain compatibility** part discusses the compatibility conditions between two different domains. By introducing the rigid - body rotation \(Q\), a compatibility equation is proposed:
\[
Q U_I - U_{II}=b\otimes n
\]
where \(b\) is a real - number vector, and \(n\) is the normal vector of the interface between the two domains in the reference state.

- The **Results** part analyzes the compatibility conditions of different phase transformations (tetragonal ↔ rhombohedral, tetragonal ↔ monoclinic, monoclinic ↔ rhombohedral). For example, the tetragonal ↔ rhombohedral phase transformation may be compatible when \(\alpha_t=\alpha_r - \beta_r\).

- The **Outlook** part proposes further research directions, including considering the energy minimization problem of incompatible interfaces, and modeling the internal field through distributed defects (such as dislocations).

### Conclusion

The paper studies the phase transformation and its compatibility problems of ferroelectric materials near the MPB by the micromechanical method. The research shows that although some phase transformations may have compatibility points, most phase transformations are not completely compatible and need to overcome certain energy barriers. This helps to explain why the tetragonal phase and the monoclinic phase can coexist throughout the MPB range, and provides a theoretical basis for future research.