CoInduction in Coq

Yves Bertot

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cs/0603119

2006-03-30

Abstract:We describe the basic notions of co-induction as they are available in the coq system. As an application, we describe arithmetic properties for simple representations of real numbers.

Logic in Computer Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Lebesgue Induction and Tonelli's Theorem in Coq

Sylvie Boldo,François Clément,Vincent Martin,Micaela Mayero,Houda Mouhcine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.05040

2022-02-10

Abstract:Lebesgue integration is a well-known mathematical tool, used for instance in probability theory, real analysis, and numerical mathematics. Thus its formalization in a proof assistant is to be designed to fit different goals and projects. Once Lebesgue integral is formally defined and the first lemmas are proved, the question of the convenience of the formalization naturally arises. To check it, a useful extension is the Tonelli theorem, stating that the (double) integral of a nonnegative measurable function of two variables can be computed by iterated integrals, and allowing to switch the order of integration. Therefore, we need to define and prove results on product spaces, hoping that they can easily derive from the existing ones on a single space. This article describes the formal definition and proof in Coq of product $\sigma$-algebras, product measures and their uniqueness, the construction of iterated integrals, up to the Tonelli theorem. We also advertise the \emph{Lebesgue induction principle} provided by an inductive type for {\nonnegative} measurable functions.

Logic in Computer Science,Functional Analysis
Countability of Inductive Types Formalized in the Object-Logic Level

Qinxiang Cao,Xiwei Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.337.5

2021-07-16

Abstract:The set of integer number lists with finite length, and the set of binary trees with integer labels are both countably infinite. Many inductively defined types also have countably many elements. In this paper, we formalize the syntax of first order inductive definitions in Coq and prove them countable, under some side conditions. Instead of writing a proof generator in a meta language, we develop an axiom-free proof in the Coq object logic. In other words, our proof is a dependently typed Coq function from the syntax of the inductive definition to the countability of the type. Based on this proof, we provide a Coq tactic to automatically prove the countability of concrete inductive types. We also developed Coq libraries for countability and for the syntax of inductive definitions, which have value on their own.

Logic in Computer Science
Optimized Program Extraction for Induction and Coinduction

Ulrich Berger,Olga Petrovska

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94418-0_7

2018-01-01

Abstract:We prove soundness of an optimized realizability interpretation for a logic supporting strictly positive induction and coinduction. The optimization concerns the special treatment of Harrop formulas which yields simpler extracted programs. We show that wellfounded induction is an instance of strictly positive induction and derive from this a new computationally meaningful formulation of the Archimedean property for real numbers. We give an example of program extraction in computable analysis and show that Archimedean induction can be used to eliminate countable choice.
Flexible Coinduction in Agda

Luca Ciccone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.06047

2020-02-17

Abstract:Theorem provers are tools that help users to write machine readable proofs. Some of this tools are also interactive. The need of such softwares is increasing since they provide proofs that are more certified than the hand written ones. Agda is based on type theory and on the propositions-as-types correspondence and has a Haskell-like syntax. This means that a proof of a statement is turned into a function. Inference systems are a way of defining inductive and coinductive predicates and induction and coinduction principles are provided to help proving their correctness with respect to a given specification in terms of soundness and completeness. Generalized inference systems deal with predicates whose inductive and coinductive interpretations do not provide the expected set of judgments. In this case inference systems are enriched by corules that are rules that can be applied at infinite depth in a proof tree. Induction and coinduction principles cannot be used in case of generalized inference systems and the bounded coinduction one has been proposed. We first present how Agda supports inductive and coinductive types highlighting the fact that data structures and predicates are defined using the same constructs. Then we move to the main topic of this thesis, which is investigating how generalized inference systems can be implemented and how their correctness can be proved.

Logic in Computer Science
Coinductive control of inductive data types

Paige Randall North,Maximilien Péroux

2023-07-20

Abstract:We combine the theory of inductive data types with the theory of universal measurings. By doing so, we find that many categories of algebras of endofunctors are actually enriched in the corresponding category of coalgebras of the same endofunctor. The enrichment captures all possible partial algebra homomorphisms, defined by measuring coalgebras. Thus this enriched category carries more information than the usual category of algebras which captures only total algebra homomorphisms. We specify new algebras besides the initial one using a generalization of the notion of initial algebra.

Category Theory,Logic in Computer Science
Induction rules in bounded arithmetic

Emil Jeřábek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-019-00702-w

2019-11-12

Archive for Mathematical Logic

Abstract:We study variants of Buss's theories of bounded arithmetic axiomatized by induction schemes disallowing the use of parameters, and closely related induction inference rules. We put particular emphasis on $\hat{\varPi }^{b}_i$ induction schemes, which were so far neglected in the literature. We present inclusions and conservation results between the systems (including a witnessing theorem for $T^i_2$ and $S^i_2$ of a new form), results on numbers of instances of the axioms or rules, connections to reflection principles for quantified propositional calculi, and separations between the systems.

mathematics,logic
A coinductive semantics of the Unlimited Register Machine

Alberto Ciaffaglione

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.73.7

2011-11-14

Abstract:We exploit (co)inductive specifications and proofs to approach the evaluation of low-level programs for the Unlimited Register Machine (URM) within the Coq system, a proof assistant based on the Calculus of (Co)Inductive Constructions type theory. Our formalization allows us to certify the implementation of partial functions, thus it can be regarded as a first step towards the development of a workbench for the formal analysis and verification of both converging and diverging computations.

Logic in Computer Science
The Instructor's Guide to Real Induction

Pete L. Clark

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1208.0973

2012-08-05

Abstract:We introduce real induction, a proof technique analogous to mathematical induction but applicable to statements indexed by an interval on the real line. More generally we give an inductive principle applicable in any Dedekind complete linearly ordered set. Real and ordered induction is then applied to give streamlined, conceptual proofs of basic results in honors calculus, elementary real analysis and topology.

History and Overview
Coq Modulo Theory - Short Paper

Pierre-Yves Strub,Qian Wang

2010-01-01

Logic in Computer Science

Abstract:Coq Modulo Theory (CoqMT) is an extension of the Coq proof assistant incorporating, in its computational mechanism, validity entailment for user-defined first-order equational theories. Such a mechanism strictly enriches the system (more terms are typable), eases the use of dependent types and provides more automation during the development of proofs. CoqMT improves over the Calculus of Congruent Inductive Constructions by getting rid of various restrictions and simplifying the type-checking algorithm and the integration of first-order decision procedures.
Propositional Calculus in Coq

Floris van Doorn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503.08744

2015-03-30

Logic

Abstract:I formalize important theorems about classical propositional logic in the proof assistant Coq. The main theorems I prove are (1) the soundness and completeness of natural deduction calculus, (2) the equivalence between natural deduction calculus, Hilbert systems and sequent calculus and (3) cut elimination for sequent calculus.
A Coq Formalization of the Bochner integral

Sylvie Boldo,François Clément,Louise Leclerc

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.03242

2022-02-10

Abstract:The Bochner integral is a generalization of the Lebesgue integral, for functions taking their values in a Banach space. Therefore, both its mathematical definition and its formalization in the Coq proof assistant are more challenging as we cannot rely on the properties of real numbers. Our contributions include an original formalization of simple functions, Bochner integrability defined by a dependent type, and the construction of the proof of the integrability of measurable functions under mild hypotheses (weak separability). Then, we define the Bochner integral and prove several theorems, including dominated convergence and the equivalence with an existing formalization of Lebesgue integral for nonnegative functions.

Logic in Computer Science,Functional Analysis
Mutual Coinduction

Moez A. AbdelGawad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.06514

2019-07-29

Abstract:In this paper we present mutual coinduction as a dual of mutual induction and also as a generalization of standard coinduction. In particular, we present a precise formal definition of mutual induction and mutual coinduction. In the process we present the associated mutual induction and mutual coinduction proof principles, and we present the conditions under which these principles hold. In spite of some mention of mutual (co)induction in research literature, but the formal definition of mutual (co)induction and the proof of the mutual (co)induction proof principles we present here seem to be the first such definition and proof. As such, it seems our work is the first to point out that monotonicity of mutual generators seems not sufficient for guaranteeing the existence of least and greatest simultaneous fixed points in complete lattices, and that continuity on the other hand is sufficient for guaranteeing their existence. [The paper has been responsively updated so as to not require the continuity of generators but only require their monotonicity, and it now includes a proof of the sufficiency of monotonicity. A full revision of the paper to reflect the relaxed requirement is currently underway.] In the course of our presentation of mutual coinduction we also discuss some concepts related to standard (also called direct) induction and standard coinduction, as well as ones related to mutual (also called simultaneous or indirect) induction. During the presentation we purposely discuss particular standard concepts so as to help motivate the definitions of their more general counterparts for mutual/ simultaneous/ indirect (co)induction. Greatest simultaneous post-fixed points, in particular, will be abstractions and models of mathematical objects (e.g., points, sets, types, predicates, etc.) that are defined mutually-coinductively.

Logic in Computer Science,Programming Languages,Logic
Coinductive Invertibility in Higher Categories

Alex Rice

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.10307

2020-08-24

Category Theory

Abstract:Invertibility is an important concept in category theory. In higher category theory, it becomes less obvious what the correct notion of invertibility is, as extra coherence conditions can become necessary for invertible structures to have desirable properties. We define some properties we expect to hold in any reasonable definition of a weak $\omega$-category. With these properties we define three notions of invertibility inspired by homotopy type theory. These are quasi-invertibility, where a two sided inverse is required, bi-invertibility, where a separate left and right inverse is given, and half-adjoint inverse, which is a quasi-inverse with an extra coherence condition. These definitions take the form of coinductive data structures. Using coinductive proofs we are able to show that these three notions are all equivalent in that given any one of these invertibility structures, the others can be obtained. The methods used to do this are generic and it is expected that the results should be applicable to any reasonable model of higher category theory. Many of the results of the paper have been formalised in Agda using coinductive records and the machinery of sized types.
Foundations of regular coinduction

Francesco Dagnino

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46298/lmcs-17(4:2)2021

2021-10-01

Logical Methods in Computer Science

Abstract:Inference systems are a widespread framework used to define possibly recursive predicates by means of inference rules. They allow both inductive and coinductive interpretations that are fairly well-studied. In this paper, we consider a middle way interpretation, called regular, which combines advantages of both approaches: it allows non-well-founded reasoning while being finite. We show that the natural proof-theoretic definition of the regular interpretation, based on regular trees, coincides with a rational fixed point. Then, we provide an equivalent inductive characterization, which leads to an algorithm which looks for a regular derivation of a judgment. Relying on these results, we define proof techniques for regular reasoning: the regular coinduction principle, to prove completeness, and an inductive technique to prove soundness, based on the inductive characterization of the regular interpretation. Finally, we show the regular approach can be smoothly extended to inference systems with corules, a recently introduced, generalised framework, which allows one to refine the coinductive interpretation, proving that also this flexible regular interpretation admits an equivalent inductive characterisation.

computer science, theory & methods,logic
Elaborating Inductive Definitions and Course-of-Values Induction in Cedille

Christopher Jenkins,Colin McDonald,Aaron Stump

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.08233

2019-03-19

Programming Languages

Abstract:In the Calculus of Dependent Lambda Eliminations (CDLE), a pure Curry-style type theory, it is possible to generically {\lambda}-encode inductive datatypes which support course-of-values (CoV) induction. We present a datatype subsystem for Cedille (an implementation of CDLE) that provides this feature to programmers through convenient notation for declaring datatypes and for defining functions over them by case analysis and fixpoint-style recursion guarded by a type-based termination checker. We demonstrate that this does not require extending CDLE by showing how datatypes and functions over them elaborate to {\lambda}-encodings, and proving that this elaboration is type- and value-preserving. This datatype subsystem and elaborator are implemented in Cedille, establishing for the first time a complete translation of inductive definitions to a small pure typed {\lambda}-calculus.
Large and Infinitary Quotient Inductive-Inductive Types

András Kovács,Ambrus Kaposi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3373718.3394770

2020-06-23

Abstract:Quotient inductive-inductive types (QIITs) are generalized inductive types which allow sorts to be indexed over previously declared sorts, and allow usage of equality constructors. QIITs are especially useful for algebraic descriptions of type theories and constructive definitions of real, ordinal and surreal numbers. We develop new metatheory for large QIITs, large elimination, recursive equations and infinitary constructors. As in prior work, we describe QIITs using a type theory where each context represents a QIIT signature. However, in our case the theory of signatures can also describe its own signature, modulo universe sizes. We bootstrap the model theory of signatures using self-description and a Church-coded notion of signature, without using complicated raw syntax or assuming an existing internal QIIT of signatures. We give semantics to described QIITs by modeling each signature as a finitely complete CwF (category with families) of algebras. Compared to the case of finitary QIITs, we additionally need to show invariance under algebra isomorphisms in the semantics. We do this by modeling signature types as isofibrations. Finally, we show by a term model construction that every QIIT is constructible from the syntax of the theory of signatures.

Logic in Computer Science
Co-induction in dynamical systems

Anthony H. Dooley,GUOhUA ZHANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143385711000083

2012-01-01

Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems

Abstract:If a countable amenable group G contains an infinite subgroup Gamma, one may define, from a measurable action of Gamma, the so-called co-induced measurable action of G. These actions were defined and studied by Dooley, Golodets, Rudolph and Sinelsh'chikov. In this paper, starting from a topological action of Gamma, we define the co-induced topological action of G. We establish a number of properties of this construction, notably, that the G-action has the topological entropy of the Gamma-action and has uniformly positive entropy (completely positive entropy, respectively) if and only if the Gamma-action has uniformly positive entropy (completely positive entropy, respectively). We also study the Pinsker algebra of the co-induced action.
Specifying programs with propositions and with congruences

Gilles Dowek

2023-04-26

Abstract:We give a presentation of Krivine and Parigot's Second-order functional arithmetic in Deduction modulo. Expressing this theory in Deduction modulo sheds light on an original aspect of this theory: the fact that programs are specified, not with propositions, but with congruences.

Logic in Computer Science
Induction for representations of coideal doubles, with an application to quantum $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$

Kenny De Commer

2024-09-27

Abstract:We investigate the theory of induction in the setting of doubles of coideal $*$-subalgebras of compact quantum group Hopf $*$-algebras. We then exemplify parts of this theory in the particular case of quantum $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$, and compute the decomposition of the regular representation for quantum $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ into irreducibles.

Quantum Algebra,Representation Theory
A Logic for Non-Monotone Inductive Definitions

Marc Denecker,Eugenia Ternovska

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cs/0501025

IF: 14.4

2005-01-13

Artificial Intelligence

Abstract:Well-known principles of induction include monotone induction and different sorts of non-monotone induction such as inflationary induction, induction over well-founded sets and iterated induction. In this work, we define a logic formalizing induction over well-founded sets and monotone and iterated induction. Just as the principle of positive induction has been formalized in FO(LFP), and the principle of inflationary induction has been formalized in FO(IFP), this paper formalizes the principle of iterated induction in a new logic for Non-Monotone Inductive Definitions (ID-logic). The semantics of the logic is strongly influenced by the well-founded semantics of logic programming. Our main result concerns the modularity properties of inductive definitions in ID-logic. Specifically, we formulate conditions under which a simultaneous definition $\D$ of several relations is logically equivalent to a conjunction of smaller definitions $\D_1 \land ... \land \D_n$ with disjoint sets of defined predicates. The difficulty of the result comes from the fact that predicates $P_i$ and $P_j$ defined in $\D_i$ and $\D_j$, respectively, may be mutually connected by simultaneous induction. Since logic programming and abductive logic programming under well-founded semantics are proper fragments of our logic, our modularity results are applicable there as well.

CoInduction in Coq

Lebesgue Induction and Tonelli's Theorem in Coq

Countability of Inductive Types Formalized in the Object-Logic Level

Optimized Program Extraction for Induction and Coinduction

Flexible Coinduction in Agda

Coinductive control of inductive data types

Induction rules in bounded arithmetic

A coinductive semantics of the Unlimited Register Machine

The Instructor's Guide to Real Induction

Coq Modulo Theory - Short Paper

Propositional Calculus in Coq

A Coq Formalization of the Bochner integral

Mutual Coinduction

Coinductive Invertibility in Higher Categories

Foundations of regular coinduction

Elaborating Inductive Definitions and Course-of-Values Induction in Cedille

Large and Infinitary Quotient Inductive-Inductive Types

Co-induction in dynamical systems

Specifying programs with propositions and with congruences

Induction for representations of coideal doubles, with an application to quantum $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$

A Logic for Non-Monotone Inductive Definitions