Comparisons of Exact Results for the Virtual Photon Contribution to Single Hard Bremsstrahlung in Radiative Return for Electron-Positron Annihilation

S. Jadach,B.F.L. Ward,S.A. Yost

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.073001

2006-03-21

Abstract:We compare fully differential exact results for the virtual photon correction to single hard photon bremsstrahlung obtained using independent calculations, both for electron-positron annihilation at high-energy colliders and for radiative return applications. The results are compared using Monte Carlo evaluations of the matrix elements as well as by direct analytical evaluation of certain critical limits. Special attention is given to the issues of numerical stability and the treatment of finite-mass corrections. It is found that agreement on the order of 10^{-5} or better is obtained over most of the range of hard photon energies, at CMS energies relevant to both high energy collisions and radiative return experiments.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to compare and verify the accurate differential results of virtual photon corrections for single - hard - photon radiation in the electron - positron annihilation process among different research groups. Specifically, the authors compared the virtual photon corrections of the single - hard - photon bremsstrahlung process in high - energy colliders and radiative return applications through independent calculations.

#### Main problems
1. **Accuracy verification**: Ensure that the results obtained by different research groups are consistent at a very high precision, especially at the next - to - next - to - leading - logarithm (NNLL) level.
2. **Numerical stability**: Focus on numerical stability and the treatment methods of finite - mass corrections to ensure reliability in practical applications.
3. **Differences in formula forms**: Explore the differences in formula forms among different calculation methods and analyze the impact of these differences on the final results.

#### Research background
- **Application scenarios**: Precision studies of Standard Model physics in the energy range from 1 GeV to 100 GeV and higher, including radiative return experiments.
- **Necessity**: To meet the precision requirement at the one - thousandth level, all QED effects must be accurately calculated up to the $\alpha^2$ order.
- **Existing work**: Multiple research groups have already given accurate results of virtual photon corrections for single - hard - photon radiation, but these results have minor differences at the NNLL level.

#### Solutions
- **Direct comparison of matrix elements**: Use a common Monte Carlo (MC) evaluation method to directly compare the matrix element expressions of different research groups.
- **Analysis of large - term cancellations**: Cancel large terms in certain expressions by analytical means to improve the stability of numerical comparisons.
- **Mass - correction comparison**: Compare in detail the finite - mass corrections in different calculation methods to ensure the consistency of results at the NLL and NNLL levels.

### Formula summary

During the comparison, the key formulas involved include:

1. **Tree - level cross - section**:
\[
\frac{d\sigma_{\text{ISR}}^{(0)}}{d\Omega dr_1 dr_2} = \frac{1}{16(4\pi)^4} \sum_{\lambda_i, \sigma} \left| M_{\text{ISR}}^{(0)} \right|^2
\]
where,
\[
\sum_{\lambda_i, \sigma} \left| M_{\text{ISR}}^{(0)} \right|^2 = \frac{16e^6}{s^2 s' r_1 r_2} \left[ (t_1^2 + u_1^2) \left(1 - \frac{2m_e^2 r_1}{s' r_2}\right) + (t_2^2 + u_2^2) \left(1 - \frac{2m_e^2 r_2}{s' r_1}\right) \right]
\]

2. **Initial - state virtual - photon correction**:
\[
\frac{d\sigma_{\text{ISR}}^{(1)}}{d\Omega dr_1 dr_2} = \frac{1}{16(4\pi)^4} \sum_{\lambda_i, \sigma} 2 \Re \left[ (M_{\text{ISR}}^{(0)})^* M_{\text{ISR}}^{(1)} \right]
\]
where,
\[
M_{\text{ISR}}^{(1)} = \frac{\alpha}{4\pi} M_{\text{ISR}}^{(0)} (f_0 + f_1 I_1 + f_2 I_2)
\]

3. **Mass correction**:
\[
\sum_{\lambda_i, \sigma} 2 \Re \left[ (M_{\text{ISR}}^{(0)})^* M_{\text{ISR}}^{(