Quantum Nature of the Big Bang

Abhay Ashtekar,Tomasz Pawlowski,Parampreet Singh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.141301
2006-04-07
Abstract:Some long standing issues concerning the quantum nature of the big bang are resolved in the context of homogeneous isotropic models with a scalar field. Specifically, the known results on the resolution of the big bang singularity in loop quantum cosmology are significantly extended as follows: i) the scalar field is shown to serve as an internal clock, thereby providing a detailed realization of the `emergent time' idea; ii) the physical Hilbert space, Dirac observables and semi-classical states are constructed rigorously; iii) the Hamiltonian constraint is solved numerically to show that the big bang is replaced by a big bounce. Thanks to the non-perturbative, background independent methods, unlike in other approaches the quantum evolution is deterministic across the deep Planck regime.
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,Astrophysics,High Energy Physics - Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the insufficient application of modeling theory in college physics teaching. Although modeling theory has achieved remarkable success in high school physics teaching, its application in college physics teaching is relatively scarce. The author believes that one of the reasons for this phenomenon is the unfamiliarity with models in college physics classrooms. Therefore, the goal of the paper is to strengthen the role of models in the classroom by describing how a college physics course goes through the modeling cycle (including model development, application, adaptation, expansion, and revision), and to identify the educational benefits of the modeling pedagogy in college physics courses. These benefits include effective knowledge organization and consistency with accepted scientific practices. Specifically, the paper explores the following aspects: 1. **Application of Modeling Theory**: Explains the basic concepts of modeling theory and its successful application in high school physics teaching. 2. **Challenges in College Physics Teaching**: Analyzes why modeling theory is less applied in college physics teaching, including teachers' unfamiliarity with modeling theory and the lack of practical application guidance. 3. **Specific Implementation of Modeling Teaching**: Describes in detail how a college physics course organizes teaching content through the modeling cycle, including model introduction, use of representation tools, coordination of multiple representation methods, initial application of the model, abstraction and generalization, and continuous development of the model. 4. **Improvement of Pedagogy**: Discusses how the modeling pedagogy affects teaching methods, making them more in line with the actual process of scientific research, such as through inquiry - based learning and studio - format course design. 5. **Case Study**: Demonstrates the practical application of the modeling pedagogy through specific teaching activities (such as the introduction of energy conservation), including how to transition from a descriptive model to a causal model and how to introduce quantitative tools. Overall, the paper aims to demonstrate the application potential and practical effects of modeling theory in college physics teaching through specific teaching practices and case studies.