Relaxing-Precessional Magnetization Switching

Hirofumi Morise,Shiho Nakamura

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.03.025

2006-01-11

Abstract:A new way of magnetization switching employing both the spin-transfer torque and the torque by a magnetic field is proposed. The solution of the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation shows that the dynamics of the magnetization in the initial stage of the switching is similar to that in the precessional switching, while that in the final stage is rather similar to the relaxing switching. We call the present method the relaxing-precessional switching. It offers a faster and lower-power-consuming way of switching than the relaxing switching and a more controllable way than the precessional switching.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics,Materials Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the deficiencies of existing magnetization switching methods in high - speed and low - power - consumption memories and data storage devices. Specifically:

1. **Problems with Relaxing Switching**:
- **High current density requirement**: The Relaxing switching method requires a relatively high current density (the critical direct - current density \(J_c\) is approximately \(10^7 \, \text{A/cm}^2\)). This is because when the angle \(\theta\) between the spin polarization direction and the magnetization direction is small, the torque \(|\hat{m} \times (\hat{p} \times \hat{m})|=\sin\theta\approx\theta\ll 1\), resulting in a very small torque.
- **Slow switching speed**: Simulation results show that the magnetization vector will repeat precessional motion before reaching the equilibrium state, which takes about 1 nanosecond. Experimental results indicate that to complete the magnetization reversal within 100 picoseconds, the required current is at least four times the calculated critical current.

2. **Problems with Precessional Switching**:
- **High requirement for current pulse shape**: Precessional switching requires precise control of the amplitude and time width of the current pulse.
- **Final state depends on initial state**: The final magnetization direction depends on its initial state, which means that "read - write" operations are required.

To solve these problems, the author proposes a new magnetization switching method - **Relaxing - Precessional Switching**. This method combines spin - transfer torque and magnetic - field torque and aims to achieve faster, lower - power - consumption and more controllable magnetization switching.

### Advantages of the new method

1. **Faster switching speed**: By introducing an external magnetic field and spin - polarized current, the magnetization vector can complete the reversal in about 0.2 nanoseconds, almost the same as Precessional Switching using a larger current.
2. **Lower power consumption**: The required critical current \(j_{\text{RP}}^c\) is lower than that of Relaxing Switching and Precessional Switching. For example, when \(H_{\text{ext}} = 0.5H_K\), \(j_{\text{RP}}^c=0.37j_P^c\).
3. **Better controllability**: Since the final state does not depend on the initial state, strict control of the current pulse time width is not required.

### Summary of mathematical formulas

- LLG equation:
\[
\frac{d\hat{m}}{dt}=-\alpha\hat{m} \times \frac{d\hat{m}}{dt}+\gamma\hat{m} \times H_{\text{eff}}+2\pi M\gamma j\hat{m} \times (\hat{p} \times \hat{m})
\]
where,
\[
H_{\text{eff}}\equiv H_{\text{ext}} - 4\pi Mm_x\hat{e}_x + H_Km_z\hat{e}_z
\]
\[
j=\frac{1}{2\pi M\gamma^2\mu_B V_M g}I_e/|e|
\]

- Analytic expression of the critical current \(j_{\text{RP}}^c\):
\[
H_{\text{ext}} = H_K\cdot h\left(\frac{j_{\text{RP}}^c\cdot 2\pi M}{H_K}\right)
\]
where,
\[
h(\xi)