Identification of youth at clinical high‐risk for psychosis: A community‐based study from India

Sai Krishna Tikka,Barikar C. Malathesh,Mamidipalli Sai Spoorthy,Govindrao N. Kusneniwar,Neeraj Agarwal,Giovanni d'Avossa,Mohammad Zia Ul Haq Katshu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13581
2024-05-30
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Abstract:Aim A two‐stage process, wherein self‐report screening precedes the structured interview, is suggested for identifying individuals at clinical high‐risk for psychosis (CHR‐P) in community samples. Aim of this study was to screen a community youth sample from India for CHR‐P using the two‐stage method. Specific objectives were to assess concordant validity of the self‐report measure and predictive validity of the two‐stage method. Methods Based on probability sampling, 2025 youth aged 15–24 years were recruited from one rural and one urban area of Telangana, a Telugu‐speaking state in India. Telugu version of the PRIME Screen‐Revised (PS‐R) and structured interview for psychosis‐risk syndromes (SIPS) were used. CHR‐P positive and negative cohorts were followed‐up for transition to psychosis at 3‐monthly intervals. Results One hundred ten individuals screened positive on PS‐R. SIPS conducted on 67 out of 110 individuals confirmed 62 (92.54%) to be CHR‐P positive. PS‐R showed 98.41% sensitivity and 90.74% specificity. Among CHR‐P positive, three participants transitioned to psychosis in 15 months. The hazard ratio for psychosis transition was 11.4. Conclusions Screening accuracy of PS‐R in the community youth sample in Telangana is optimum. The hazard ratio for psychosis transition in the community identified CHR‐P indicates good predictive validity for the two‐stage method.
psychiatry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?