Characteristics and rates of infection by HIV in people receiving non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) against HIV

Irene Carrillo,Marta López de las Heras,Silvia Calpena Martínez,Laura Prieto-Pérez,Beatriz Álvarez Álvarez,Aws Waleed Al-Hayani,José Izuzquiza Suarez-Inclan,Sara Lumbreras Fernandez,Patricia Quesada Luengo,María Elia Asensi Diaz,Marina Bernal Palacios,Paula Asensio Mathews,Barbara Soler Bonafont,Raquel Bravo Ruiz,Marta Hernández-Segurado,Miguel Górgolas,Alfonso Cabello
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2024-056109
2024-06-01
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Abstract:Introduction/objectives The use of non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) emerges as a strategic intervention to reduce HIV infection risk following sexual encounters in our setting. Notwithstanding, there is a scarcity of contemporary data regarding adherence to this treatment, its effectiveness and tolerance. Our study aims to delve into these factors among individuals who have resorted to nPEP after high-risk sexual encounters. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of cases administered nPEP for HIV from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021 at a tertiary hospital in Madrid. The study included all adults over 18 years who sought care at the emergency department of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz Hospital following a risky sexual encounter and were subsequently recommended HIV nPEP treatment. Results 878 individuals received nPEP for HIV and underwent initial serological tests. Of these, 621 had comprehensive follow-ups. The prescribed regimen for all was raltegravir (RAL) 1200 mg combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) 245/200 mg daily for 28 days. The study revealed a 1.1% rate (n=10) of previously undetected infection and a 0.16% (n=1) failure rate of nPEP. Regarding regimen tolerability, 5.6% (n=35) experienced symptoms linked to the treatment, yet none necessitated discontinuation of the regimen. On the contrary, six per cent (n=53) reported symptoms consistent with an STI during one of the medical visits; specifically, 4.4% had urethritis, and 1.6% had proctitis. Conclusion nPEP with RAL/TDF/FTC demonstrates high efficacy and safety, contingent on proper adherence. There is an observed increase in STI prevalence in this cohort, with nearly half of the participants not engaging in appropriate follow-up after initiating nPEP.
infectious diseases
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) following high-risk sexual behavior. Specifically, the study aims to explore the following aspects: 1. **Adherence to nPEP**: Understanding whether individuals receiving nPEP treatment can complete the entire course on time. 2. **Effectiveness of nPEP**: Assessing the effectiveness of nPEP in preventing HIV infection, including the rate of undetected infections and nPEP failure rate. 3. **Tolerance of nPEP**: Analyzing whether individuals receiving nPEP treatment experience drug-related adverse reactions and the severity of these adverse reactions. Through these evaluations, the study hopes to provide support for future research, clinical practice, and public health policy, particularly in improving adherence to nPEP and assessing its long-term efficacy. Additionally, the study also focuses on the prevalence of other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among individuals receiving nPEP treatment to gain a comprehensive understanding of the health status of this group.