Conflict of interest disclosure by US cardiothoracic surgeons

Dyanna L. Melo,Taufiq Islam,Khadija Nasser,Eric L. R. Bédard,Simon R. Turner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12094
IF: 3.282
2024-02-09
World Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Background Surgeon–industry collaboration is a key driver of advancement in surgical technology and practice. Disclosures of financial relationships between investigators and industries are important to ensure transparent and critical evaluation of literature. Methods All American cardiothoracic (CT) surgeons who published in three major CT surgery journals in 2019 were identified. Whether these surgeons disclosed any conflicts of interest was recorded and compared to actual payments received within 5 years of publication as reported by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. Results In the study period, there were 1079 unique manuscripts involving 885 American CT surgeons as authors, which combined for 2719 author instances. Of these, 96.2% of authors (851 of 885) received payments from companies. The authors who received payments produced 2651 author instances (97.4%). Financial disclosure was reported in only 11.4% (301 of 2651) of these instances. In total, 851 surgeons received more than ‐ 5.9 million per year. The largest individual payments were from "Associated Research Funding," with over 96.5 million to American CT surgeons over 5 years. Conclusions Nearly all the reviewed publications in three top CT surgery journals were by surgeons who received payments from companies, but very few of these payments were recorded as potential conflicts of interest. A more consistent and robust policy of COI disclosure is needed to reduce perceptions of bias.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?