Comparison of self-rated health status in students of military university and non-military colleges
Jun Xu,Jing-bo Zhao,Ya-ning Xie,Jin Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.10.021
2006-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To compare the difference in the self-rated health status of students from the military university and non-military colleges by questionnaires. METHODS: By random cluster sampling, 820 on-campus students from one military university and two non-military colleges in Guangzhou city were selected as the subjects to assess their self-rated health status with the Self-Rated Health Measurement Scale (SRHMS V1.0). The SRHMS V1.0 was consisted of 3 subscales of physical health, psychosocial health and social health, totally 48 items in 9 dimensions of physical symptom and organic function, daily physical activity, physical mobility, positive emotion, psychosocial symptom and negative emotion, cognitive function, role activity and social adaptability, social resource and social contact, social support. The analyzed indices included the final scores of the three subscales, 9 dimensions and SRHMS V1.0, with the calculated formula: final score=original score of dimension/the theoretically highest score of corresponding dimension×100. The higher score of SRHMS V1.0 indicated the better self-rated health status. The self-compiled questionnaires were used to investigate the subjects' general conditions, including gender, age, nationality, marital status and education background, et al. The uniform-printed questionnaires were sent out, and in the uniform instruction, the subjects were required to independently finish the questionnaires, which were taken back on the spot. RESULTS: Totally 820 questionnaires were sent out and 795 ones were reclaimed with the retrieving rate of 96.9%. Among the reclaimed questionnaires, there were 773 completely finished questionnaires with the finishing rate of 97.2%. ①For the students of non-military colleges, the final scores of 3 subscales, 9 dimensions and SRHMS V1.0 ranged from 61.10 to 97.55, among which the comparatively higher score was 83.68 of the physical health subscale, and below 70 in 4 dimensions of physical symptom and organic function, psychosocial symptom and negative emotion, cognitive function and social support. ②The final scores of 3 subscales, 9 dimensions and SRHMS V1.0 of students from non-military colleges were higher than those of students from military university, with the significant difference in the scores of physical, psychosocial subscales and SRHMS V1.0 (83.01±6.60),(84.41±6.46),t=2.879,P < 0.05;(66.05±14.05),(68.82 ±12.97),t=2.777,P < 0.05;(74.33±8.76),(76.09±8.89),t=2.599,P < 0.05, while there was no significant difference in the score of social health subscale between the two groups. In the 3 dimensions of physical symptom and organic function, positive emotion and social support, the final scores had significant differences between the two groups (64.47±12.57),(67.30 ±12.82),t=3.050,P < 0.05;(73.17±16.26),(77.19±14.10),t=3.642,P < 0.05;(64.28±17.41),(67.58±15.95),t=2.733,P < 0.05(P < 0.05),while there was no significant difference in the final scores of other dimensions, including daily physical activity, physical mobility, psychosocial symptom and negative emotion, cognitive function, role activity ands social adaptability, social resource and social contact(P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The self-rated health status of students from military university and non-military colleges are both generally good, and the students from non-military colleges are significantly better than those from military university, especially in the aspects of physical health, psychologic health and general self-rated health. Great efforts should be put into the improvement of psychologic health status among the military university students.