Air quality in Canadian port cities after regulation of low-sulphur marine fuel in the North American Emissions Control Area

Angelos T Anastasopolos,Uwayemi M Sofowote,Philip K Hopke,Mathieu Rouleau,Tim Shin,Aman Dheri,Hui Peng,Ryan Kulka,Mark D Gibson,Paul-Michel Farah,Navin Sundar,Angelos T. Anastasopolos,Uwayemi M. Sofowote,Philip K. Hopke,Mark D. Gibson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147949
2021-10-01
Abstract:<p>Large marine vessels have historically used high-sulphur (S) residual fuel oil (RFO), with substantial airborne releases of sulphur dioxide (SO₂) and fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) enriched in vanadium (V), nickel (Ni) and other air pollutants. To address marine shipping air pollution, Canada and the United States have jointly implemented a North American Emissions Control Area (NA ECA) within which ships are regulated to use lower-sulphur marine fuel or equivalent SO<sub>2</sub> scrubbers (i.e., 3.5% maximum fuel S reduced to 1% S in 2012 and 0.1% S in 2015). To investigate the effects of these regulations on local air quality, we examined changes in air pollutant (SO₂, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, NO₂, O₃), and related PM<sub>2.5</sub> components (V, Ni, sulphate) concentrations over 2010–2016 at the Canadian port cities of Halifax, Vancouver, Victoria, Montreal, and Quebec City. SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations showed large statistically significant decreases at all sites (−28% to −83% mean hourly change), with the largest improvements in the coastal cities when the 0.1% fuel S regulation took effect. Statistically significant PM<sub>2.5</sub> but smaller fractional reductions were also observed (−7% to −37% mean hourly change), reflecting the importance of non-marine PM sources. RFO marker species V and Ni in PM<sub>2.5</sub> dramatically declined following regulation implementation, consistent with decreased RFO use likely indicating the switch to low-S distillate fuel oil rather than exhaust scrubbers for initial compliance. Significant changes in other pollutants with non-marine sources (NO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>) were not contemporaneous with the regulatory timeline. The large SO<sub>2</sub> improvements in the port cities have reduced 1-h concentrations to &lt;30 ppb, comparable to Canadian urban locations with few local SO<sub>2</sub> sources and likely reducing health risks to susceptible populations such as asthmatics and the elderly. Our findings indicate that the implementation of the NA ECA improved air quality at Canadian port cities immediately following the requirement for lower-S fuel. These air quality improvements suggest that large-scale international benefits can result from implementation of the 2020 global low-S marine fuel regulations.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?