Lung transplantation in HIV seropositive recipients: An analysis of the UNOS registry

Jack K. Donohue,Ernest G. Chan,Sarah Clifford,John P. Ryan,Masashi Furukawa,Ghady Haidar,Alessandro Bertani,Chadi A. Hage,Pablo G. Sanchez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.15246
2024-01-25
Clinical Transplantation
Abstract:Background Experience with lung transplantation (LT) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is limited. Many studies have demonstrated the success of kidney and liver transplantation in HIV‐seropositive (HIV+) patients. Our objective was to conduct a national registry analysis comparing LT outcomes in HIV+ to HIV‐seronegative (HIV−) recipients. Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried to identify LTs performed in adult HIV+ patients between 2016 and 2023. Patients with unknown HIV status, multiorgan transplants, and redo transplants were excluded. The primary endpoints were mortality and graft rejection. Survival time was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results The study included 17 487 patients, 67 of whom were HIV+. HIV+ recipients were younger (59 vs. 62 years, p = .02), had higher pulmonary arterial pressure (28 vs. 25 mm Hg, p = .04), and higher lung allocation scores (47 vs. 41, p = .01) relative to HIV− recipients. There were no differences in graft/recipient survival time between groups. HIV+ recipients had higher rates of post‐transplant dialysis (18% vs. 8.4%, p = .01), but otherwise had similar post‐transplant outcomes to HIV‐recipients. Conclusions This national registry analysis suggests LT outcomes in HIV+ patients are not inferior to outcomes in HIV− patients and that well‐selected HIV+ recipients can achieve comparable patient and graft survival rates relative to HIV− recipients.
surgery,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?