11 85 v 2 [ as tr oph ] 1 9 Ju n 20 07 Holographic tachyon model
Jingfei Zhang,Xin Zhang,Hongya Liu
2021-01-01
Abstract:The astronomical observations over the past decade indicate that our universe is currently undergoing an epoch of accelerated expansion (see e.g. Refs. [1, 2, 3]). Such an accelerated expansion implies, following the FriedmannRobertson-Walker (FRW) cosmology, the existence of a “dark energy”, a mysterious exotic matter with large enough negative pressure, whose energy density has been a dominative power of the universe. The astrophysical feature of dark energy is that it remains unclustered at all scales where gravitational clustering of baryons and nonbaryonic cold dark matter can be seen.Its gravity effect is shown as a repulsive force so as to make the expansion of the universe accelerate when its energy density becomes dominative power of the universe. The combined analysis of cosmological observations suggests that the universe is spatially flat, and consists of about 70% dark energy, 30% dust matter (cold dark matter plus baryons), and negligible radiation. The most obvious candidate for the dark energy is the cosmological constant λ [4] for which w = −1 (for reviews see e.g. Refs. [5]). However, the cosmological constant always suffers from the “fine-tuning” and “cosmic coincidence” problems. Another candidate for dark energy is the energy density associated with dynamical scalar-field, a slowly varying, spatially homogeneous component. An example of scalar-field dark energy is the so-called “quintessence” [6], a scalar field Q slowly evolving down its potential V (Q). Provided that the evolution of the field is slow enough, the kinetic energy density is less than the potential energy density, giving rise to the negative pressure responsible to the cosmic acceleration. So far a wide variety of scalar-field dark energy models have been proposed. Besides quintessence, these also include phantom [7], K-essence [8], tachyon [9], ghost condensate [10] and quintom [11] amongst many. But we should note that the mainstream viewpoint regards the scalar field dark energy models as an effective description of an underlying theory of dark energy. In addition, other proposals on dark energy include interacting dark energy models [12], braneworld models [13], and Chaplygin gas models [14], etc.. One should realize, nevertheless, that almost these models are settled at the phenomenological level, lacking theoretical root.