Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Efficient Batch Query Answering Under Differential Privacy

An Adaptive Mechanism for Accurate Query Answering under Differential Privacy

Optimal error of query sets under the differentially-private matrix mechanism

Differential Privacy for the Analyst via Private Equilibrium Computation

A Differential Privacy Mechanism Design Under Matrix-Valued Query

Private Query Release via the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform

A New Analysis of Differential Privacy's Generalization Guarantees

Optimizing error of high-dimensional statistical queries under differential privacy

Convex Optimization for Linear Query Processing under Approximate Differential Privacy

Integrating historical noisy answers for improving data utility under differential privacy

Relaxed Marginal Consistency for Differentially Private Query Answering

A bounded-noise mechanism for differential privacy

Answering Private Linear Queries Adaptively using the Common Mechanism

A Workload Division Differential Privacy Algorithm to Improve the Accuracy for Linear Computations

Principled Evaluation of Differentially Private Algorithms using DPBench

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Efficient and Private Marginal Reconstruction with Local Non-Negativity

Differentially Private SQL with Bounded User Contribution

Differential Privacy: on the trade-off between Utility and Information Leakage

Differential Privacy on Dynamic Data

The optimal mechanism in differential privacy