Present status of controversies regarding the thermal Casimir force

V.M.Mostepanenko,V.B.Bezerra,R.S.Decca,B.Geyer,E.Fischbach,G.L.Klimchitskaya,D.E.Krause,D.Lopez,C.Romero
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/39/21/S58
2005-12-17
Abstract:It is well known that, beginning in 2000, the behavior of the thermal correction to the Casimir force between real metals has been hotly debated. As was shown by several research groups, the Lifshitz theory, which provides the theoretical foundation for the calculation of both the van der Waals and Casimir forces, leads to different results depending on the model of metal conductivity used. To resolve these controversies, the theoretical considerations based on the principles of thermodynamics and new experimental tests were invoked. We analyze the present status of the problem (in particular, the advantages and disadvantages of the approaches based on the surface impedance and on the Drude model dielectric function) using rigorous analytical calculations of the entropy of a fluctuating field. We also discuss the results of a new precise experiment on the determination of the Casimir pressure between two parallel plates by means of a micromechanical torsional oscillator.
Quantum Physics,Other Condensed Matter,High Energy Physics - Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the controversy regarding the behavior of the thermal Casimir force between real metals. Since 2000, the influence of thermal corrections on the Casimir force has been the focus of intense discussion. Specifically, the paper mainly focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Influence of different conductivity models**: According to the Lifshitz theory, the theoretical basis for calculating the van der Waals force and the Casimir force depends on the metal conductivity model used. Different models (such as the Drude model and the plasma model) lead to different results. 2. **Thermodynamic consistency problem**: Some models (such as the Drude model) violate the third law of thermodynamics (Nernst heat theorem) at low temperatures, which has sparked a controversy about the validity of these models. 3. **Experimental verification**: In order to distinguish the correctness of different theoretical models, precise experimental tests need to be carried out. The paper discusses a new experiment using micro - electro - mechanical torsion oscillators to measure the Casimir pressure and analyzes the degree of agreement between the experimental results and different theoretical models. ### Specific problems - **Drude model vs plasma model**: The Drude model predicts a large thermal correction at short distances, while at long distances or high temperatures, the predicted Casimir free energy and force are only half of that of an ideal metal. The predictions of the plasma model are more consistent with the situation of an ideal metal. - **Thermodynamic consistency**: The Drude model violates the third law of thermodynamics in a perfect lattice, while the plasma model and the impedance method are completely consistent with thermodynamics. - **Experimental verification**: Through a series of experiments (including static and dynamic experiments), researchers have found that the experimental data support traditional methods (such as the plasma model and the impedance method) more, rather than the Drude model. ### Conclusion The main purpose of the paper is to summarize the current controversial situation regarding the thermal Casimir force and to evaluate the validity and consistency of different models through theoretical analysis and experimental results. Ultimately, the paper concludes that traditional methods (such as the plasma model and the impedance method) are more in line with experimental observations and thermodynamic principles, while the Drude model has deficiencies in multiple aspects.