Food Webs: Experts Consuming Families of Experts

A. G. Rossberg,H. Matsuda,T. Amemiya,K. Itoh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.q-bio/0508002

2005-07-31

Abstract:The question what determines the structure of natural food webs has been listed among the nine most important unanswered questions in ecology. It arises naturally from many problems related to ecosystem stability and resilience. The traditional view is that population-dynamical stability is crucial for understanding the observed structures. But phylogeny (evolutionary history) has also been suggested as the dominant mechanism. Here we show that observed topological features of predatory food webs can be reproduced to unprecedented accuracy by a mechanism taking into account only phylogeny, size constraints, and the heredity of the trophically relevant traits of prey and predators. The analysis reveals a tendency to avoid resource competition rather than apparent competition. In food webs with many parasites this pattern is reversed.

Populations and Evolution,Quantitative Methods

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand the determinants of the structure of natural food webs. Specifically, the authors explored which mechanisms can explain the observed topological features of food webs and proposed a model based on phylogeny, size constraints, and the inheritance of predator and prey trophic - related traits.

### Main problems of the paper

1. **Determinants of the structure of natural food webs**
- The determinants of food web structure have always been one of the important unresolved problems in ecology. This problem is closely related to ecosystem stability and resilience.
- The traditional view holds that population dynamic stability is the key to understanding the observed food web structure. However, some studies have also pointed out that phylogeny may be the main mechanism.

2. **Proposal of the model**
- The authors proposed a new "matching model", which only considers phylogeny, size constraints, and the inheritance of predator and prey trophic - related traits.
- The model simulates the evolution of the species pool through a random evolutionary process (including speciation and extinction) and verifies its accuracy by comparing the food webs generated by the model with actual data.

3. **Resource competition and apparent competition**
- The analysis revealed a tendency to avoid resource competition rather than apparent competition. In food webs containing a large number of parasites, this pattern is reversed.

4. **Model verification**
- The model was verified by comparison with 17 known food web data sets, and the results showed that the model can reproduce the observed food web topological features with unprecedented accuracy.
- Compared with one of the best - existing descriptions, the niche model, the matching model performs better on most data sets, especially in describing complex food web structures.

### Formula summary

- **Link strength formula**
\[
m=\sum_{i = 1}^{n}\begin{cases}
1&\text{if }f_i=v_i\\
0&\text{if }f_i\neq v_i
\end{cases}
\]
where \(f_i\) and \(v_i\) represent the foraging and vulnerability characteristics of consumers and resources respectively.

- **Link probability formula**
\[
C_0 := P(m\geq m_0)=2^{-n}\sum_{m = m_0}^{n}\binom{n}{m}
\]

- **Ornstein - Uhlenbeck process**
\[
dx(\tau)=-\mu x(\tau)dt+\eta dW(\tau)
\]
where \(W(\tau)\) is a Wiener process, and:
\[
\mu =-\log(1 - 2p_v),\quad\eta=\sqrt{2\mu}
\]

### Conclusion

By proposing and verifying a matching model based on phylogeny, size constraints, and the inheritance of trophic traits, this paper successfully explains the formation mechanism of the structure of natural food webs. The model can not only reproduce the observed food web topological features with high accuracy but also reveals the importance of avoiding resource competition. This research result provides a new perspective and tool for future further research on ecosystem structure and function.