Abstract:We explore the utility of future photometric redshift imaging surveys for delineating the large‐scale structure of the Universe, and assess the resulting constraints on the cosmological model. We perform the following two complementary types of analysis. (i) We quantify the statistical confidence and the accuracy with which such surveys will be able to detect and measure characteristic features in the clustering power spectrum such as the acoustic oscillations and the turnover, in a ‘model‐independent’ fashion. We show for example that a 10 000‐deg2 imaging survey with depth r= 22.5 and photometric redshift accuracy δz/(1 +z) = 0.03 will detect the acoustic oscillations with 99.9 per cent confidence, measuring the associated preferred cosmological scale with 2 per cent precision. Such a survey will also detect the turnover with 95 per cent confidence, determining the corresponding scale with 20 per cent accuracy. (ii) By assuming a Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model power spectrum we calculate the confidence with which a non‐zero baryon fraction can be deduced from such future galaxy surveys. We quantify ‘wiggle detection’ by calculating the number of standard deviations by which the baryon fraction is measured, after marginalizing over the shape parameter. This is typically a factor of 4 more significant (in terms of number of standard deviations) than the above ‘model‐independent’ result. For both analyses, we quantify the variation of the results with magnitude depth and photometric redshift precision, and discuss the prospects for obtaining the required performance with realistic future surveys. We conclude that the precision with which the clustering pattern may be inferred from future photometric redshift surveys will be competitive with contemporaneous spectroscopic redshift surveys, assuming that systematic effects can be controlled. We find that for equivalent wiggle detection power, a photometric redshift survey requires an area approximately 12[δz/(1 +z)]/0.03 times larger than a spectroscopic survey, for a given magnitude limit. We also note that an analysis of luminous red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey may yield a marginal detection of acoustic oscillations in the imaging survey, in addition to that recently reported for the spectroscopic component.

Observing Baryon Oscillations with Cosmic Shear

Detecting Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in Dark Matter from Kinematic Weak Lensing Surveys

Cosmology with shear ratios: a joint study of weak lensing and spectroscopic redshift datasets

Reconstructing the matter power spectrum with future cosmic shear surveys

Deciphering baryonic feedback with galaxy clusters

Baryon-free $S_8$ tension with Stage IV cosmic shear surveys

Cosmology with photometric redshift surveys

Cross-correlation cosmic shear with the SDSS and VLA FIRST surveys

Cosmology from cosmic shear power spectra with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data

Probing dark energy using baryonic oscillations in the galaxy power spectrum as a cosmological ruler

Non-parametric Cosmology with Cosmic Shear

Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from galaxy surveys

Novel Cosmological Tests from Combining Galaxy Lensing and the Polarized Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect

Can CMB Lensing Help Cosmic Shear Surveys?

Measuring the 2D baryon acoustic oscillation signal of galaxies in WiggleZ: cosmological constraints

DES Y3 cosmic shear down to small scales: constraints on cosmology and baryons

Probing the Cosmological Principle with weak lensing shear

Cosmology from clustering, cosmic shear, CMB lensing, and cross correlations: combining Rubin observatory and Simons Observatory

Constraining dark energy via baryon acoustic oscillations in the (an)isotropic light-cone power spectrum