Telomeres and the natural lifespan limit in humans
Troels Steenstrup,Jeremy D. Kark,Simon Verhulst,Mikael Thinggaard,Jacob V. B. Hjelmborg,Christine Dalgård,Kirsten Ohm Kyvik,Lene Christiansen,Massimo Mangino,Timothy D. Spector,Inge Petersen,Masayuki Kimura,Athanase Benetos,Carlos Labat,Ronit Sinnreich,Shih-Jen Hwang,Daniel Levy,Steven C. Hunt,Annette L. Fitzpatrick,Wei Chen,Gerald S. Berenson,Michelangela Barbieri,Giuseppe Paolisso,Shahinaz M. Gadalla,Sharon A. Savage,Kaare Christensen,Anatoliy I. Yashin,Konstantin G. Arbeev,Abraham Aviv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101216
2017-04-06
Aging
Abstract:An ongoing debate in demography has focused on whether the human lifespan has a maximal natural limit. Taking a mechanistic perspective, and knowing that short telomeres are associated with diminished longevity, we examined whether telomere length dynamics during adult life could set a maximal natural lifespan limit. We define leukocyte telomere length of 5 kb as the 'telomeric brink', which denotes a high risk of imminent death. We show that a subset of adults may reach the telomeric brink within the current life expectancy and more so for a 100-year life expectancy. Thus, secular trends in life expectancy should confront a biological limit due to crossing the telomeric brink.