Identifying Near Earth Object Families

Hai Fu,Robert Jedicke,Daniel D. Durda,Ronald Fevig,James V. Scotti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2005.05.004
2005-05-13
Abstract:The study of asteroid families has provided tremendous insight into the forces that sculpted the main belt and continue to drive the collisional and dynamical evolution of asteroids. The identification of asteroid families within the NEO population could provide a similar boon to studies of their formation and interiors. In this study we examine the purported identification of NEO families by Drummond (2000) and conclude that it is unlikely that they are anything more than random fluctuations in the distribution of NEO osculating orbital elements. We arrive at this conclusion after examining the expected formation rate of NEO families, the identification of NEO groups in synthetic populations that contain no genetically related NEOs, the orbital evolution of the largest association identified by Drummond (2000), and the decoherence of synthetic NEO families intended to reproduce the observed members of the same association. These studies allowed us to identify a new criterion that can be used to select real NEO families for further study in future analyses, based on the ratio of the number of pairs and the size of strings to the number of objects in an identified association.
Astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **To identify whether the Near - Earth Object (NEO) groups are composed of celestial families with a common origin, or are just random fluctuations in the distribution of orbital elements**. Specifically, the authors re - evaluated the NEO groups proposed by Drummond (2000) and used numerical simulations and statistical analysis to verify whether these groups are genetically related. ### Main problem background 1. **Importance of NEO groups** - Identifying NEO groups generated by catastrophic collisions can provide valuable information about the structure and dynamic evolution of these celestial bodies. - Similar to the study of main - belt asteroid groups, NEO groups can help understand the formation process and internal structure of NEOs. 2. **Limitations of previous studies** - Drummond (2000) used D - criterion analysis (orbital similarity) to find multiple associations, chains and pairs in the known NEO samples. - However, these findings may be just random fluctuations in the distribution of orbital elements, rather than truly genetically related groups. ### Main objectives of the paper 1. **Verify Drummond (2000)'s findings** - Through numerical simulations and statistical analysis, test whether the NEO groups identified by Drummond are statistically significant. 2. **Develop new identification criteria** - Propose a new criterion for selecting truly possible NEO groups, so that future studies can identify these groups more accurately. ### Method overview 1. **Numerical simulation** - Generate 100 synthetic NEO models based on the four - dimensional orbital element and absolute magnitude distribution of Bottke et al. (2002a). - Use the volume search method to identify associations in these synthetic models. 2. **Statistical analysis** - Compare the distribution of association sizes identified in the real NEO samples and synthetic models. - Use the Kolmogorov - Smirnov (K - S) test to compare the differences between the real and synthetic data sets. 3. **Dynamic evolution simulation** - Simulate the dynamic evolution of a synthetic NEO group similar to the A1 association to determine how long this group can still be detected. ### Conclusion Through the above methods, the authors conclude that: - The NEO groups identified by Drummond (2000) are likely to be random fluctuations, rather than truly genetically related groups. - A new identification criterion is proposed, that is, based on the ratio of the number of pairs to the number of objects, to help future studies more accurately identify the real NEO groups. This research not only helps to understand the formation and evolution of NEOs, but also provides important guidance for future NEO group studies.