Abstract:RNA editing can be crucial for the expression of genetic information via inserting, deleting, or substituting a few nucleotides at specific positions in an RNA sequence. Within coding regions in an RNA sequence, editing usually occurs with a certain bias in choosing the positions of the editing sites. In the mitochondrial genes of {\it Physarum polycephalum}, many more editing events have been observed at the third codon position than at the first and second, while in some plant mitochondria the second codon position dominates. Here we propose an evolutionary model that explains this bias as the basis of selection at the protein level. The model predicts a distribution of the three positions rather close to the experimental observation in {\it Physarum}. This suggests that the codon position bias in {\it Physarum} is mainly a consequence of selection at the protein level.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the phenomenon of codon position bias during the RNA editing process. Specifically, the author focuses on the fact that in some organisms, the frequency of RNA editing events occurring at specific codon positions is significantly different. For example, in the mitochondrial genes of *Physarum polycephalum*, most editing events occur at the third codon position, while in the mitochondrial genes of some plants, editing mainly occurs at the first and second codon positions. This phenomenon is puzzling because RNA editing occurs at the RNA level, and the concept of codon is mainly meaningful when translating proteins. To understand this phenomenon, the author proposes an evolutionary model aiming to explain why editing would prefer certain codon positions. This model assumes that the selection pressure mainly acts at the protein level, that is, those editing events that can produce functionally normal proteins are more likely to be retained. Through this model, the author hopes to predict the distribution of editing events at each codon position in different organisms and compare it with the experimental observation results to verify the validity of the model. The core assumptions of the model include: 1. **Random mutation**: During the reproduction of organisms, random base substitutions, insertions or deletions will occur in the mitochondrial DNA sequence. 2. **Selection mechanism**: Only those mutations that can be restored to the correct amino acid sequence after editing will be retained by natural selection. 3. **Fitness calculation**: Use the BLOSUM62 matrix to quantify the similarity between different amino acids, thereby calculating the fitness of each codon. 4. **Editing cost**: Introduce an editing cost parameter to represent the impact of the resources consumed in the editing process on fitness. Through the analysis of the mitochondrial genes of *Physarum polycephalum* and plants, the author finds that their model can well explain the phenomenon of editing position preference in *Physarum polycephalum*, but there is a certain deviation in plants. This indicates that there may be other biological mechanisms in plants that affect the selection of editing positions.

A model for codon position bias in RNA editing

A-To-I Rna Editing Alters Less-Conserved Residues of Highly Conserved Coding Regions: Implications for Dual Functions in Evolution

A-to-I Editing Sites Are a Genomically Encoded G: Implications for the Evolutionary Significance and Identification of Novel Editing Sites

Selection on codon bias in yeast: a transcriptional hypothesis

Inferring biophysical models of evolution from genome-wide patterns of codon usage

A Structural Determinant Required for Rna Editing

The Yin and Yang of Trna: Proper Binding of Acceptor End Determines the Catalytic Balance of Editing and Aminoacylation

The Landscape of A-to-I RNA Editome Is Shaped by Both Positive and Purifying Selection

Learning from the Codon Table: Convergent Recoding Provides Novel Understanding on the Evolution of A-to-I RNA Editing

RNA Editing of Nuclear Transcripts in Arabidopsis Thaliana

Conserved A-to-I RNA editing with non-conserved recoding expands the candidates of functional editing sites

Lower GC-content in Editing Exons: Implications for Regulation by Molecular Characteristics Maintained by Selection

Narrowing down the candidates of beneficial A-to-I RNA editing by comparing the recoding sites with uneditable counterparts

The implications of APOBEC3-mediated C-to-U RNA editing for human disease

Evolution of tRNA pool shapes variation in selection on codon usage across the Saccharomycotina subphylu

Low-background applications of MICROMEGAS detector technology

Genetic and selective constraints on the optimization of gene product diversity

Selectively Constrained RNA Editing Regulation Crosstalks with Pirna Biogenesis in Primates

Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection.

RNA Editing and Alternative Splicing of the Insect Nachr Subunit Alpha6 Transcript: Evolutionary Conservation, Divergence and Regulation

A-to-I RNA editing — immune protector and transcriptome diversifier