Superfluid Spin-down, with Random Unpinning of the Vortices

M. Jahan-Miri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-004-4728-4

2005-04-25

Abstract:The so-called ``creeping'' motion of the pinned vortices in a rotating superfluid involves ``random unpinning'' and ``vortex motion'' as two physically separate processes. We argue that such a creeping motion of the vortices need not be (biased) in the direction of an existing radial Magnus force, nor should a constant microscopic radial velocity be assigned to the vortex motion, in contradiction with the basic assumptions of the ``vortex creep'' model. We point out internal inconsistencies in the predictions of this model which arise due to this unjustified foundation that ignores the role of the actual torque on the superfluid. The proper spin-down rate of a pinned superfluid is then calculated and turns out to be much less than that suggested in the vortex creep model, hence being of even less observational significance for its possible application in explaining the post-glitch relaxations of the radio pulsars.

Astrophysics,Other Condensed Matter

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the motion mechanism of vortices during the spin - down process of superfluid in the interior of neutron stars. Specifically, the paper criticizes the existing "vortex creep" model and proposes a more reasonable method for calculating the superfluid spin - down rate. The paper points out that the "vortex creep" model has internal inconsistencies, which are mainly reflected in the following aspects:

1. **Confusion between vortex unpinning and radial motion**:
- The paper believes that the unpinning of vortices and the radial motion of vortices are two physically independent processes, while the "vortex creep" model wrongly equates these two processes. That is, vortex unpinning does not necessarily lead to the radial motion of vortices.

2. **The role of external torque**:
- The "vortex creep" model ignores the external torque actually acting on the superfluid, but instead assumes a constant microscopic radial velocity \(v_0\), which is inconsistent with basic physical principles. The paper emphasizes that the radial motion of vortices should be determined by the external torque, not an artificially set constant velocity.

3. **Contradictions in model predictions**:
- When there is no external torque acting, the spin - down rate predicted by the "vortex creep" model is not zero, while in fact it should be zero. In addition, under certain specific conditions, the rotation direction predicted by the model is opposite to the actual situation.

To solve these problems, the paper proposes a new method for calculating the superfluid spin - down rate, which takes into account the probability of vortex unpinning and the radial motion velocity of vortices after unpinning. The specific formula is as follows:

\[v_r = v_f\exp\left(-\frac{E_p}{kT}\frac{\omega_{cr}-\omega}{\omega_{cr}}\right)\]

where:
- \(v_r\) is the average radial velocity of vortices.
- \(v_f\) is the radial motion velocity of unpinning vortices, which depends on the external torque.
- \(E_p\) is the pinning energy.
- \(k\) is the Boltzmann constant.
- \(T\) is the temperature.
- \(\omega_{cr}\) is the critical lag value.
- \(\omega\) is the lag value, defined as the difference between the superfluid rotation frequency and the container rotation frequency.

By this method, the superfluid spin - down rate obtained in the paper is much smaller than that predicted by the "vortex creep" model, and can differ by up to 12 orders of magnitude. Therefore, the paper believes that it is not significant to explain the post - glitch spin - down behavior of neutron star pulsars by randomly unpinning vortices.