Reply to Samuely et al. <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/0503153" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0503153">cond-mat/0503153</a>

J. Kortus,O.V. Dolgov,R.K. Kremer,A.A. Golubov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond-mat/0503365
2005-03-15
Abstract:Samuely et al. (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="cond-mat/0503153" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0503153">cond-mat/0503153</a>) make the strong claim that our letter is 'contradicting several established experimental results'. As we will show below this is not justified and the claims from are based on a misinterpretation of our results.
Superconductivity,Materials Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?