Abstract:A core tension in the study of plurality elections is the clash between the classic Hotelling-Downs model, which predicts that two office-seeking candidates should position themselves at the median voter's policy, and the empirical observation that real-world democracies often have two major parties with divergent policies. Motivated by this tension and drawing from bounded rationality, we introduce a dynamic model of candidate positioning based on a simple behavioral heuristic: candidates imitate the policy of previous winners. The resulting model is closely connected to evolutionary replicator dynamics and exhibits complex behavior, despite its simplicity. For uniformly-distributed voters, we prove that when there are $k = 2$, $3$, or $4$ candidates per election, any symmetric candidate distribution converges over time to a concentration of candidates at the center. With $k \ge 5$, however, we prove that the candidate distribution does not converge to the center. For initial distributions without any extreme candidates, we prove a stronger statement than non-convergence, showing that the density in an interval around the center goes to zero when $k \ge 5$. As a matter of robustness, our conclusions are qualitatively unchanged if a small fraction of candidates are not winner-copiers and are instead positioned uniformly at random. Beyond our theoretical analysis, we illustrate our results in simulation; for five or more candidates, we find a tendency towards the emergence of two clusters, a mechanism suggestive of Duverger's Law, the empirical finding that plurality leads to two-party systems. Our simulations also explore several variations of the model, including non-uniform voter distributions and other forms of noise, which exhibit similar convergence patterns. Finally, we discuss the relationship between our model and prior work on strategic equilibria of candidate positioning games.

How political parties adjust to fixed voter opinions

Kinetic modeling of opinion formation of peoples via multiple political parties

A modified Hegselmann-Krause model for interacting voters and political parties

It's all relative: Spatial positioning of parties and ideological shifts

Beyond the Median Voter: How Affective Polarization Shapes Party Polarization in Multidimensional Ideological Spaces

A blue sky bifurcation in the dynamics of political candidates

The dynamics of strategic voting: pathways to consensus and gridlock

Why are U.S. Parties So Polarized? A "Satisficing" Dynamical Model

Replicating Electoral Success

A dynamic model of party membership and ideologies

Dynamics of Strategic Three-Choice Voting

Inferring Population Preferences via Mixtures of Spatial Voting Models

Polarization and Consensus in a Voter Model under Time-Fluctuating Influences

The effect of political sophistication and party identification on voter–party congruence. A comparative analysis of 30 countries

Opinion Models, Election Data, and Political Theory

Political opinion formation: Opinion distribution and human heterogeneity

The drastic outcomes from voting alliances in three-party bottom-up democratic voting (1990 $\rightarrow$ 2013)

Ambiguity and vagueness in party competition

On the stationary measures of two variants of the voter model

Explaining Differences in Voting Patterns Across Voting Domains Using Hierarchical Bayesian Models

Voter-like dynamics with conflicting preferences on modular networks