Fluctuations in models of biological macroevolution

Per Arne Rikvold

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.609762

2005-03-01

Abstract:Fluctuations in diversity and extinction sizes are discussed and compared for two different, individual-based models of biological coevolution. Both models display power-law distributions for various quantities of evolutionary interest, such as the lifetimes of individual species, the quiet periods between evolutionary upheavals larger than a given cutoff, and the sizes of extinction events. Time series of the diversity and measures of the size of extinctions give rise to flicker noise. Surprisingly, the power-law behaviors of the probability densities of quiet periods in the two models differ, while the distributions of the lifetimes of individual species are the same.

Populations and Evolution,Statistical Mechanics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the fluctuation characteristics in two different simplified models of biological co - evolution, especially the fluctuations of diversity and the scale of extinction events. Specifically, the author studies these two models to understand the fluctuation behaviors and their long - term correlations of quantities (such as species lifespan, the duration of quiescent periods, and the scale of extinction events) that are of great significance in ecology and evolutionary biology.

### Core problems of the paper

1. **Fluctuations of diversification and extinction events**:
- The author studied two individual - based biological co - evolution models and explored the fluctuations of diversity (i.e., the number of different species in the community) and the scale of extinction events.
- These fluctuations are manifested as power - law distributions, indicating the self - organized criticality of the system.

2. **Comparison of models**:
- **Model A**: The population size is controlled by the Verhulst factor, and all species interact.
- **Model B**: Producers and consumers are introduced, and the population is maintained by a small fraction of species that can directly utilize external resources.

3. **Fluctuations and long - term correlations**:
- The fluctuation characteristics of these two models on a long - time scale were studied, including the time series of diversity, the distribution of the duration of quiescent periods, and the distribution of species lifespan.
- Special attention was paid to whether these fluctuations conform to 1/f noise, which is consistent with the phenomena observed in the fossil record.

### Main findings

- **Diversity fluctuations**:
- Both models show significant diversity fluctuations, but the diversity of Model B is significantly higher than that of Model A.

- **Distribution of the duration of quiescent periods**:
- The distribution of the duration of quiescent periods in Model A follows a power law of \( \sim 1/t^2 \), while that in Model B follows a power law of \( \sim 1/t \).

- **Distribution of species lifespan**:
- The distributions of species lifespan in both models are very close, both following a power law of \( \sim 1/t^2 \).

- **Power spectral density (PSD)**:
- The power spectral densities (PSD) of the diversity time series of both models show 1/f noise characteristics.

### Conclusions

By comparing the two models, the author revealed their differences in fluctuation characteristics, especially the differences in the distribution of the duration of quiescent periods. These differences may be related to the lower synchronicity of species extinction events in Model B. Future research will further explore the performance of these models under more realistic conditions and verify their effectiveness in explaining the evolution process of actual ecosystems.

In summary, this paper aims to reveal the statistical laws of biodiversity changes and extinction events by comparing the fluctuation characteristics in two biological co - evolution models, thus providing a new perspective for understanding the macro - evolution process.