Synaptic Plasticity with Discrete state synapses

H. D. Abarbanel,S. S. Talathi,L. Gibb,M. Rabinovich
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.031914
2005-01-19
Abstract:Experimental observations on synaptic plasticity at individual glutamatergic synapses from the CA3 Shaffer collateral pathway onto CA1 pyramidal cells in the hippocampus suggest that the transitions in synaptic strength occur among discrete levels at individual synapses (~\cite{Peter} and S. S.-H. Wang, unpublished data used with the authors' permission). This happens for both long term potentiation (LTP) and long term depression (LTD) induction protocols. O'Connor, Wittenberg, and Wang have argued that three states would account for their observations on individual synapses in the CA3-CA1 pathway. We develop a quantitative model of this three state system with transitions among the states determined by a competition between kinases and phosphatases shown by O'Connor et al. to be determinant of LTP and LTD, respectively. Specific predictions for various plasticity protocols are given by coupling this description of discrete synaptic AMPA conductance changes to a model of postsynaptic membrane potential and associated intracellular calcium fluxes to yield the transition rates among the states. We then present various LTP and LTD induction protocols to the model system and report the resulting whole cell changes in AMPA conductance. We also examine the effect of our discrete state synaptic plasticity model on the synchronization of realistic oscillating neurons. We show that one-to-one synchronization is enhanced by the plasticity we discuss here and the presynaptic and postsynaptic oscillations are in phase. Synaptic strength saturates naturally in this model and does not require artificial upper or lower cutoffs, in contrast to earlier models of plasticity.
Quantitative Methods,Neurons and Cognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the specific mechanism of synaptic plasticity, especially the single glutamatergic synapses in the hippocampal CA3 - CA1 pathway. Experimental observations show that the strength changes of these synapses occur between discrete states rather than continuous changes. Specifically, the paper explores the following issues: 1. **Discrete - state changes in synaptic strength**: Experimental data indicate that under long - term potentiation (LTP) and long - term depression (LTD) induction protocols, the changes in synaptic strength occur between discrete levels. O'Connor et al. proposed that three states could explain their observations. 2. **Establishment of a quantitative model**: The authors developed a quantitative model to describe the transitions between these three states. These transitions are determined by the competition between kinases and phosphatases, which are the key factors in LTP and LTD discovered by O'Connor et al. 3. **Prediction of the results of different plasticity protocols**: By coupling the discrete synaptic AMPA conductance changes with the postsynaptic membrane potential and the related intracellular calcium ion flow model, the authors predicted the state - transition rates under different plasticity protocols and reported the changes in the whole - cell AMPA conductance. 4. **The influence of synchronization**: The authors also studied the influence of the discrete - state synaptic plasticity model on the synchronization of realistic oscillatory neurons. In particular, they found that this plasticity enhances the one - to - one synchronization between neurons, and the synchronized neurons are in - phase. ### Specific problem summary - **Background problem**: Existing synaptic plasticity models usually assume that synaptic strength changes continuously, but experimental data suggest that the strength changes of a single synapse may be discrete. - **Core problem**: How to use a quantitative model to describe and predict this discrete - state synaptic plasticity and verify its performance under different experimental conditions. - **Application problem**: What is the influence of this discrete - state synaptic plasticity on neuron synchronization, especially in the hippocampus? ### Key formulas 1. **Average occupation number**: \[ p_l(t)=\frac{1}{N_S}\sum_{n = 1}^{N_S}N_n^l(t) \] 2. **State - transition rate equation**: \[ \frac{dp_l(t)}{dt}=\sum_{k = 0}^{L - 1}[W(k\rightarrow l)(t)p_k(t)-W(l\rightarrow k)(t)p_l(t)] \] 3. **Normalized AMPA conductance**: \[ G_{\text{AMPA}}(t)=\sum_{n = 1}^{N_S}\sum_{l = 0}^{L - 1}g_lN_n^l(t)=N_S\sum_{l = 0}^{L - 1}g_lp_l(t) \] 4. **Fixed - point solution**: \[ P_{\text{fixed point}}=\left(\frac{gh}{h(f + g)+bf^2},\frac{fh}{h(f + g)+bf^2},\frac{bf^2}{h(f + g)+bf^2}\right) \] Through these problems and models, the authors aim to gain a deeper understanding of the mechanism of synaptic plasticity and provide a theoretical basis for future research.