Abstract:Although Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations are still the dominant tool for engineering design and analysis applications involving turbulent flows, standard RANS models are known to be unreliable in many flows of engineering relevance, including flows with separation, strong pressure gradients or mean flow curvature. With increasing amounts of 3-dimensional experimental data and high fidelity simulation data from Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS), data-driven turbulence modeling has become a promising approach to increase the predictive capability of RANS simulations. However, the prediction performance of data-driven models inevitably depends on the choices of training flows. This work aims to identify a quantitative measure for a priori estimation of prediction confidence in data-driven turbulence modeling. This measure represents the distance in feature space between the training flows and the flow to be predicted. Specifically, the Mahalanobis distance and the kernel density estimation (KDE) technique are used as metrics to quantify the distance between flow data sets in feature space. To examine the relationship between these two extrapolation metrics and the machine learning model prediction performance, the flow over periodic hills at Re = 10595 is used as test set and seven flows with different configurations are individually used as training sets. The results show that the prediction error of the Reynolds stress anisotropy is positively correlated with Mahalanobis distance and KDE distance, demonstrating that both extrapolation metrics can be used to estimate the prediction confidence a priori . A quantitative comparison using correlation coefficients shows that the Mahalanobis distance is less accurate in estimating the prediction confidence than KDE distance. The extrapolation metrics introduced in this work and the corresponding analysis provide an approach to aid in the choice of data source and to assess the prediction performance for data-driven turbulence modeling.

Complexity of extreme-event prediction in turbulent flows

Limits to extreme event forecasting in chaotic systems

Predictability of isotropic turbulence by massive ensemble forecasting

Are extreme dissipation events predictable in turbulent fluid flows?

Extreme statistics and extreme events in dynamical models of turbulence

Harnessing the instability mechanisms in airfoil flow for the data-driven forecasting of extreme events

Predicting observed and hidden extreme events in complex nonlinear dynamical systems with partial observations and short training time series

Predicting extreme events in a data-driven model of turbulent shear flow using an atlas of charts

Recurrent flow patterns as a basis for turbulence: predicting statistics from structures

How do chaos and turbulence affect the predictability of natural complex fluid flow systems?

Analysis and Simulation of Extremes and Rare Events in Complex Systems

Data-driven prediction of large-scale spatiotemporal chaos with distributed low-dimensional models

Evaluation of Extreme Value Predictions for Unsteady Flow Distortion of Aero-Engine Intakes

A Priori Assessment of Prediction Confidence for Data-Driven Turbulence Modeling

Recurrent flow analysis in spatiotemporally chaotic 2-dimensional Kolmogorov flow

An efficient training method to learn a model of turbulence

Benchmarking Autoregressive Conditional Diffusion Models for Turbulent Flow Simulation

Dynamics of a Data-Driven Low-Dimensional Model of Turbulent Minimal Pipe Flow

Analog-Based Forecasting of Turbulent Velocity: Relationship between Unpredictability and Intermittency