Abstract:In 2004, the Chinese Central Government introduced the urban consolidation (Cun Liang Gui Hua) policy, aiming at a change in development approaches from urban expansion in periphery areas to intensification in built-up urban areas. The rationale behind is to address the severe problems caused by rapid urbanization, such as land use inefficiency, environment deterioration, and increasing local debts. Through the promulgation of stringent limitation on rural land acquisition in the mid-2000s, the new policy enhanced urban redevelopment, especially in mega-cities facing acute land scarcity in their established areas. The implementation of the urban consolidation policy has been accompanied by further policy additions, which are introduced to balance the power distribution among the stakeholders, and accordingly lead to changes in procedures and mechanisms. Building upon Giddens’ structuration theory, Foucault’s approach to power and Ostrom’s institutional analysis and development framework, this research develops a power arena framework to examine the power relations among the stakeholders in urban consolidation. Case studies of three dilapidated residential areas in Luohu and Futian districts, Shenzhen are selected to develop and test the framework. Data are collected from semi-structured interviews and site observations, supplemented by information gathered from newspapers and social media. The main findings show that the new policy and its associated institutional amendment empowered the individual property owners to participate in the decision making process and the mounting community power to some extent constrained the power of the local government. However, the local government is still capable of manipulating all the other stakeholders thus plays a dominant role in the various power relations. The expectations on a transformation towards collaborative institutions have not fully achieved, especially in situations where government intervention was excluded. The distribution of power among stakeholders is neither flat nor random but hierarchical in urban consolidation. The institutional arrangements place the involved actors to the various positions in the power hierarchy at the top of which the state power sits. China’s institutional reform seems not aiming at establishing a participatory governance system to pacify social resistance and smooth the way of urban redevelopment. Rather, the reform ultimately contributes to enhancing state power over urban land and development. The findings are theoretically and practically significant. They contribute to understanding the complex power relations underlying urban development and explaining urban governance influenced by changing planning policies.

'Consensus' as a Tool of Foreclosure: Hong Kong's Land Supply Consultation

The Cause and Response of Different Outcomes in Private Historical Building Conservation in Hong Kong：Based on Three Typical Cases

A Framework & Dynamic Model for Reform of Residential Land Supply Policy in Urban China

Urban Regeneration and Re-Use: China and Europe

STATES OF COMPULSION: Reassessing 'State‐Led' Neighborhood Change in Hong Kong

Local Government Competition and Centralised Urban Growth Management Policy Implementation: Evidence from China

Conflict Analysis in Public Engagement Program of Urban Planning in Hong Kong

The Institutional Logic of the Evolution of Land Consolidation Policy in China:Analytical Framework and Historical Observation

The Facelift of Singapore Chinatown: Unbalanced Renovation by Radical Western Wave

Implications for Sustainable Land Use in High-Density Cities: Evidence from Hong Kong

Restructuring the State: Policy Transition of Construction Land Supply in Urban and Rural China

Power Relations in Urban Consolidation: Case Study of Three Residential Redevelopment Projects in Shenzhen, China

Consensus-building in Policy Argumentation: Practical Logic and Methodological Tools

Breaking the Land Monopoly: Can Collective Land Reform Alleviate the Housing Shortage in China's Mega-Cities?

A reflection on coproduction processes in urban collective construction land transformation: A case study of Guangzhou in the Pearl River Delta

The Concept and Consensus of Building Public Space

From Urban Sprawl to Land Consolidation in Suburban Shanghai under the Backdrop of Increasing Versus Decreasing Balance Policy: A Perspective of Property Rights Transfer

Decoding Urban Land Governance: State Reconstruction in Contemporary Chinese Cities

Using GIS and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Conflict Resolution in Land Use Planning

Whose China Model is it anyway? The contentious search for consensus

Land Use Practice in a Hyper-Dense City: A Lesson from Hong Kong