Abstract:Older adults experience a greater benefit from multisensory integration than their younger counterparts, but it is unclear why. One hypothesis is that age-related sensory decline weakens unisensory stimulus effectiveness, causing a boost in multisensory gain through inverse effectiveness. Many previous studies present stimuli at the same intensity for both younger and older adults (i.e., stimulus-matched), as opposed to accounting for each participant's unique perceptual ability (i.e., perception-matched). This makes it difficult to discern the source of age-related differences in multisensory gain. As such, we used two experiments to examine whether sensory decline is contributing to age-related differences in multisensory gain. In the first, we presented auditory (pure tones in noise), visual (Gabor patches in noise), and audiovisual stimuli and recorded response times from 31 younger (18–25) and 30 older (55–80) adults. Importantly, all participants were given identical stimuli, with the expectation that older adults would show worse unisensory performance, inducing inverse effectiveness. The second task was identical (younger N = 31, older N = 34), except stimuli were presented at each participant's 50% detection threshold, identified with an adaptive psychophysical staircase, controlling for any influence of inverse effectiveness. Older adults were found to exhibit greater multisensory gain (as measured by race model violations) on stimulus- but not perception-matched tasks, thus aligning with the principle of inverse effectiveness. That is, when accounting for potential age-related differences in perceptual abilities, older adults no longer experienced greater benefit from multisensory integration. These two experiments together suggest that the age-related increases in multisensory integration previously reported may be in part due to age-related declines in vision and audition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

The Attentional Boost Effect in Older Adults: Examining the Vulnerable Boost Hypothesis

The attentional boost effect facilitates the encoding of contextual details: New evidence with verbal materials and a modified recognition task

Divided attention can enhance early-phase memory encoding: The attentional boost effect and study trial duration.

Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: The attentional boost effect in implicit memory.

Memory and attention: A double dissociation between memory encoding and memory retrieval

The attentional boost effect in vocabulary memory

It is a match! Timely response to a specific target boosts concurrent task processing.

Both target detection and response contribute to the attentional boost effect.

Attentional boost effect: research based on source memory and emotional materials

The effects of the detection stimulus duration on the persistence of the attentional boost effect

The modulation of temporal predictability on attentional boost effect

Sustained attention and aging: Overcoming the decrement?

The Attentional Blink Between Two Color Processing Tasks

Sustained-attention capacity in young and older adults.

A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention.

Enhanced multisensory gain in older adults may be a by-product of inverse effectiveness: Evidence from a speeded response-time task.

Age-related effects in inter-trial inhibition of attention.

Paying attention to binding: Further studies assessing the role of reduced attentional resources in the associative deficit of older adults

The Costs (and Benefits?) of Effortful Listening for Older Adults: Insights from Simultaneous Electrophysiology, Pupillometry, and Memory

Response, rather than target detection, triggers the attentional boost effect in visual search.

Overall Vigilance and Sustained Attention Decrements in Healthy Aging