You Can Lead an Adolescent to Mindfulness, but You Can't Make Them Mindful

Catherine Johnson,Amanda Taylor,Julia Dray,Darren Dunning

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02391-w

2024-06-23

Mindfulness

Abstract:Meta-analyses of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) in schools consistently show small, positive effects, but the field remains dominated by studies with low methodological rigour. Recent large randomised controlled trials in adolescents demonstrate poor traction in this age group together with some adverse effects, creating a crossroads for their future. In their recent commentary on the null effects of the MYRIAD trial (Kuyken et al., 2022), Strohmaier and Bailey (2023) postulated that making mindfulness practice available within the school day may increase the dosage and benefits of MBIs for adolescents, and called for funders to direct efforts at developing and testing this approach. We agree that identifying ways to increase dose beyond weekly classroom lessons is important, but explore whether this suggestion is practical or developmentally appropriate for secondary school settings. Our commentary broadens to group together other large and moderately large RCTs that have also shown disappointing results in adolescents, and presents seven barriers that together may be compounding the lack of effect in this age group. We offer alternative suggestions for future school-based research and delivery of MBIs.

psychiatry,psychology, clinical

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the effects and challenges of implementing Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs) in school settings. The authors point out that although MBIs have shown positive impacts for adults, recent large-scale randomized controlled trials have yielded less satisfactory results for adolescents.

The paper specifically analyzes the following issues:
1. **Methodological Quality**: Early research on school-based mindfulness interventions often had methodological limitations, such as non-experimental designs, lack of long-term follow-up, and researcher bias.
2. **Dose-Response Effect**: Compared to adult interventions, MBIs for adolescents may be less effective due to insufficient practice.
3. **Developmental Appropriateness**: Adolescence may not be an ideal period for universal mindfulness interventions, partly because children at this age are in a unique stage of emotional regulation and cognitive development.
4. **Motivational Factors**: Adolescents are often required to participate in these courses rather than doing so voluntarily, which may affect their engagement and the outcomes.
5. **Specific Case Analysis**: The paper cites several large-scale randomized controlled trials that found no significant positive impact of MBIs on adolescents' mental health, and in some cases, observed negative effects.

Based on the above analysis, the authors propose several recommendations for future research and practice:
- Continue to explore and develop MBIs at the elementary school level.
- For adolescent students, consider adopting more diverse intervention programs to cater to different interests and needs.
- Encourage student involvement in course design to enhance relevance and appeal.
- Given the developmental characteristics of adolescents, special attention should be paid to avoiding potential negative impacts when designing interventions.

In summary, the paper aims to discuss how to improve mindfulness intervention strategies for adolescents through a comprehensive analysis of current research findings, especially under more rigorous methodological conditions.