Abstract:Type Ia supernovae play a key role in the evolution of galaxies by polluting the interstellar medium with a fraction of iron peak elements larger than that released in the core-collapse supernova events. Their light curve, moreover, is widely used in cosmological studies as it constitutes a reliable distance indicator on extragalactic scales. Among the mechanisms proposed to explain the Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the single- and double-degenerate channels are thought to be the dominant ones, which implies a different distribution of time delays between the progenitor formation and the explosion. In this paper, we aim to determine the dominant mechanism by comparing a compilation of Type Ia SN rates with those computed from various cosmic star-formation histories coupled with different delay-time distribution functions. We also evaluate the relative contributions of both channels. By using a least-squares fitting procedure, we modeled the observations of Type Ia SN rates assuming different combinations of three recent cosmic star-formation rates and seven delay-time distributions. The goodness of these fits are statistically quantified by the $ test. For two of the three cosmic star-formation rates, the single degenerate scenario provides the most accurate explanation for the observations, while a combination of 34 single-degenerate- and 66 double-degenerate delay-time distributions is more plausible for the remaining tested cosmic star-formation rates. Though dependent on the assumed cosmic star-formation rate, we find arguments in favor of the single-degenerate model. From the theoretic point of view, at least sim 34 of the Type Ia SN must have been produced through the single-degenerate channel to account for the observations. The wide, double-degenerate mechanism slightly under-predicts the observations at redshift $z 1$, unless the cosmic SFR flattens in that regime. On the contrary, although the purely close double-degenerate scenario can be ruled out, we cannot rule out a mixed scenario with single- and double-degenerate progenitors.

Population Synthesis for Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae

The Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae with Long Delay Times

Considering the Single and Binary Origins of the Type IIP SN 2017eaw

Population synthesis for low and intermediate mass binaries

Evolution of White Dwarf Binaries: Supersoft X-Ray Sources and Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae

Constraining Supernova Ia Progenitors by Their Locations in Host Galactic Discs

Constraining Supernova Ia Progenitors by their Locations in Host Galactic Disc

Cosmic Type Ia SN rate and constraints on SN Ia progenitors

Double-detonation explosions as progenitors of type Iax supernovae

Type Ia Supernovae from First-generation Stars

Cosmic Type Ia supernova rate and constraints on supernova Ia progenitors

Binary progenitor systems for Type Ic supernovae

WD+RG systems as the progenitors of Type Ia supernovae

Young Remnants of Type Ia Supernovae and Their Progenitors: A Study of SNR G1.9+0.3

A super-Eddington wind scenario for the progenitors of type Ia supernovae: binary population synthesis calculations

The Core-Degenerate Scenario for the Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae

Fate of supernova progenitors in massive binary systems

ON THE PROGENITORS OF SUPER-CHANDRASEKHAR MASS TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE

Producing type Iax supernovae from a specific class of helium-ignited WD explosions?

Reconciling 56Ni Production in Type Ia Supernovae with Double Degenerate Scenarios