Abstract: The concept of complementarity, originally defined for non-commuting observables of quantum systems with states of non-vanishing dispersion, is extended to classical dynamical systems with a partitioned phase space. Interpreting partitions in terms of ensembles of epistemic states (symbols) with corresponding classical observables, it is shown that such observables are complementary to each other with respect to particular partitions unless those partitions are generating. This explains why symbolic descriptions based on an \emph{ad hoc} partition of an underlying phase space description should generally be expected to be incompatible. Related approaches with different background and different objectives are discussed.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to extend the concept of complementarity from quantum systems to classical dynamical systems. Specifically, the author explores whether the observables of classical dynamical systems can have complementarity when the phase space is partitioned, and explains why the symbolic descriptions based on arbitrary partitions of the phase space are usually incompatible. ### Specific formulation of the problem 1. **Definition of complementarity and its scope of application**: - In quantum mechanics, complementarity refers to non - commuting observables, which cannot be measured precisely simultaneously. - However, in classical dynamical systems, all observables are usually considered to be commuting, so complementarity does not seem to apply. 2. **Phase - space partitioning of classical dynamical systems**: - The author introduces the partitioning of the phase space and interprets it as a set of epistemic states, with each partition corresponding to a classical observable. - In this way, the author studies the relationships between these observables and explores whether they can be considered complementary. 3. **Incompatibility of symbolic descriptions**: - The author points out that the symbolic descriptions based on arbitrary partitions of the phase space are usually incompatible, unless these partitions are generating partitions. - This means that for most partitions, there is complementarity between different observables, that is, they cannot provide precise information simultaneously. ### Solutions and main results - **Partitioning and symbolic dynamics**: - By introducing the partitioning of the phase space, the author defines symbolic dynamics, which is a method of representing the state of a system by a sequence of symbols. - Symbolic dynamics provides important qualitative insights into nonlinear dynamical systems, but the choice of the partitioning of the phase space is arbitrary, which raises questions about preferred partitions and invariants. - **Epistemic Accessibility**: - The author defines epistemic accessibility, that is, whether the exact state of the system can be determined through continuous measurement. - If a partition makes some states inaccessible, the observables corresponding to these states may be complementary. - **Conditions for complementary observables**: - The author proves that only generating partitions can produce compatible observables, and arbitrary partitions usually lead to incompatible or complementary observables. - This explains why the symbolic descriptions based on arbitrary partitions of the phase space are usually incompatible. ### Summary The main contribution of this paper lies in extending the concept of complementarity from quantum systems to classical dynamical systems, and through the study of phase - space partitioning and symbolic dynamics, reveals that there may also be complementarity phenomena similar to those in quantum systems in classical systems. This extension not only deepens our understanding of classical dynamical systems, but also provides a new perspective for studying information processing and measurement problems in complex systems.

Complementarity in classical dynamical systems