The influence of geometry, surface character and flexibility on the permeation of ions and water through biological pores

Oliver Beckstein,Mark S. P. Sansom
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3967/1/1/005
2004-06-18
Abstract: A hydrophobic constriction site can act as an efficient barrier to ion and water permeation if its diameter is less than the diameter of an ion's first hydration shell. This hydrophobic gating mechanism is thought to operate in a number of ion channels, e.g. the nicotinic receptor, bacterial mechanosensitive channels (MscL and MscS) and perhaps in some potassium channels (e.g. KcsA, MthK, and KvAP). Simplified pore models allow one to investigate the primary characteristics of a conduction pathway, namely its geometry (shape, pore length, and radius), the chemical character of the pore wall surface, and its local flexibility and surface roughness. Our extended (ca. 0.1 \mu s) molecular dynamic simulations show that a short hydrophobic pore is closed to water for radii smaller than 0.45 nm. By increasing the polarity of the pore wall (and thus reducing its hydrophobicity) the transition radius can be decreased until for hydrophilic pores liquid water is stable down to a radius comparable to a water molecule's radius. Ions behave similarly but the transition from conducting to non-conducting pores is even steeper and occurs at a radius of 0.65 nm for hydrophobic pores. The presence of water vapour in a constriction zone indicates a barrier for ion permeation. A thermodynamic model can explain the behaviour of water in nanopores in terms of the surface tensions, which leads to a simple measure of "hydrophobicity" in this context. Furthermore, increased local flexibility decreases the permeability of polar species. An increase in temperature has the same effect, and we hypothesise that both effects can be explained by a decrease in the effective solvent-surface attraction which in turn leads to an increase in the solvent-wall surface free energy.
Subcellular Processes,Biological Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand the physical mechanisms of ion and water permeation in biological pores, especially how the geometry, surface properties and local flexibility affect these permeation processes. Specifically, the research focuses on: 1. **Influence of pore geometry**: including how the shape, length and radius of the pore affect the permeation of ions and water molecules. 2. **Influence of the chemical properties of the pore wall**: how the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of the pore wall affects the permeation behavior. 3. **Influence of local flexibility**: how the local fluctuations (i.e., flexibility) of the pore wall affect the permeation. ### Specific problem description #### 1. Permeation mechanisms of ions and water molecules in biological pores The paper explores how the geometric and chemical characteristics of the pore work together to control the permeation of ions and water molecules. For example, a short and hydrophobic pore is closed to water when the radius is less than 0.45 nm, and increasing the polarity of the pore wall (reducing its hydrophobicity) can lower this critical radius until, for a hydrophilic pore, liquid water can remain stable at a radius close to that of the water molecule. #### 2. Existence of water vapor and ion permeation barrier Research shows that the existence of water vapor in the restricted area indicates the formation of a barrier to ion permeation. Through a thermodynamic model, the author explains the behavior of water in nanopores, which involves surface tension and provides a simple method for measuring "hydrophobicity". #### 3. Influence of local flexibility and temperature Increasing local flexibility will reduce the permeability of polar substances, and a rise in temperature has a similar effect. The author hypothesizes that these two effects can be explained by reducing the effective attraction between the solvent and the surface, resulting in an increase in the solvent - wall surface free energy. ### Mathematical models and formulas To gain a deeper understanding of these phenomena, the author proposes a thermodynamic model based on surface energy. Key formulas include: - **Openness**: \[ \langle \omega(R) \rangle = \frac{1}{1 + \exp[-\beta \Delta \Omega(R)]} \] where \(\beta=\frac{1}{k_B T}\), and \(\Delta \Omega(R)\) is the free - energy difference between the gas and liquid phases. - **Free - energy difference**: \[ \Delta \Omega(R, L, \theta_e) = 2\pi R \gamma_{lv}(R + L \cos \theta_e) \] where \(\gamma_{lv}\) is the surface tension of the liquid - gas interface, and \(\theta_e\) is the contact angle. - **Equilibrium constant**: \[ K(R)=\frac{T_c(R)}{T_o(R)}=\frac{T_{\text{sim}}-T_o(R)}{T_o(R)} \] These models and formulas help to explain the experimental results and provide a theoretical understanding of the behavior of water and ions in the pores. In summary, this paper aims to reveal the physical mechanisms of ion and water permeation in biological pores through molecular dynamics simulations and thermodynamic models, especially the influence of geometry, surface properties and local flexibility on these processes.