Comparison of Epidemiology, Demography, Treatment (Surgery and Radiotherapy), and Survival Between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Non‐Indigenous Women With Cervical Cancer in NSW, Australia in 2009–2018

Susannah Jacob,Gabriel Gabriel,Mei Ling Yap,Shalini Vinod,Kalinda Griffiths,David Sheehan,Susan Anderson,Geoff Delaney
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14140
2024-11-27
Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:•This population‐based study shows a higher incidence and earlier age at diagnosis of cervical cancer among Aboriginal compared to non‐Aboriginal women in NSW, Australia. •Stage at diagnosis and treatment rates for radiotherapy and surgery showed no significant differences, and 5‐year overall survival was also similar. •Although overall access to cancer treatment appears equitable, there were significant disparities in access to treatment associated with socioeconomic disadvantage and residing in remote areas among Aboriginal women. Background Health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia are significantly worse than in the non‐Indigenous population. Aim To evaluate demographic factors and treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) rates for cervical cancer and to compare these between the Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal populations to identify any differences in outcomes or modifiable treatment differences between the populations. Methods Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients in the state of New South Wales, Australia, diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2009 and 2018 using linked registry, treatment, and death data. Results The crude incidence rate for cervical cancer in Aboriginal women in NSW (17.29/100,000) was more than double the rate among non‐Aboriginal women (6.77/100,000). Aboriginal women were diagnosed with cervical cancer, including metastatic disease, at a younger age. There was no significant difference in presentation stage, surgery or radiotherapy treatment rates, or overall survival at 5 years between the two populations. Conclusion Although access to cancer care looks similar as an aggregate in Aboriginal versus non‐Aboriginal populations, there were disparities with reduced access to care (patients who did not receive either radiotherapy or surgery) among Aboriginal patients who were socioeconomically disadvantaged or residing in remote areas. The lower age of cancer diagnosis among Aboriginal women may have effects on survivorship, including negative effects on fertility, loss of income, and other personal, social, and economic consequences. Efforts to improve access to care, including screening, diagnosis, and treatment, should be targeted toward younger Aboriginal women and those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged or those residing in remote areas.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?