24-Month Outcomes of Indirect Decompression Using a Minimally Invasive Interspinous Fixation Device versus Standard Open Direct Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Comparison
Ganesan Baranidharan,Beatrice Bretherton,Richard Feltbower,Jake Timothy,Almas Khan,Ashok Subramanian,Mushtaq Ahmed,Tracey Crowther,Helen Radford,Harun Gupta,Muthusamy Chandramohan,Douglas Beall,Timothy Deer,Thomas Hedman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s453343
IF: 2.8319
2024-06-17
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Ganesan Baranidharan, 1, 2 Beatrice Bretherton, 1, 3 Richard G Feltbower, 4 Jake Timothy, 5 Almas Latif Khan, 6, 7 Ashok Subramanian, 8 Mushtaq Ahmed, 9 Tracey A Crowther, 1, 10 Helen Radford, 10, 11 Harun Gupta, 12 Muthusamy Chandramohan, 13 Douglas P Beall, 14 Timothy R Deer, 15 Thomas Hedman 16 1 Pain Management Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; 2 School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; 3 School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; 4 Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; 5 Department of Neuroscience, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; 6 Department of Spine Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; 7 Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; 8 Somerset Spinal Surgery Service, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK; 9 Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK; 10 Research & Innovation, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; 11 Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; 12 Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; 13 Radiology Department, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK; 14 Comprehensive Specialty Care, Edmond, OK, USA; 15 The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA; 16 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA Correspondence: Ganesan Baranidharan, Pain Management Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK, Email Purpose: An early-stage, multi-centre, prospective, randomised control trial with five-year follow-up was approved by Health Research Authority to compare the efficacy of a minimally invasive, laterally implanted interspinous fixation device (IFD) to open direct surgical decompression in treating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Two-year results are presented. Patients and Methods: Forty-eight participants were randomly assigned to IFD or decompression. Primary study endpoints included changes from baseline at 8-weeks, 6, 12 and 24-months follow-ups for leg pain (visual analogue scale, VAS), back pain (VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), LSS physical function (Zurich Claudication Questionnaire), distance walked in five minutes and number of repetitions of sitting-to-standing in one minute. Secondary study endpoints included patient and clinician global impression of change, adverse events, reoperations, operating parameters, and fusion rate. Results: Both treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in mean leg pain, back pain, ODI disability, LSS physical function, walking distance and sitting-to-standing repetitions compared to baseline over 24 months. Mean reduction of ODI from baseline levels was between 35% and 56% for IFD (p< 0.002), and 49% to 55% for decompression (p< 0.001) for all follow-up time points. Mean reduction of IFD group leg pain was between 57% and 78% for all time points (p< 0.001), with 72% to 94% of participants having at least 30% reduction of leg pain from 8-weeks through 24-months. Walking distance for the IFD group increased from 66% to 94% and sitting-to-standing repetitions increased from 44% to 64% for all follow-up time points. Blood loss was 88% less in the IFD group (p=0.024) and operating time parameters strongly favoured IFD compared to decompression (p< 0.001). An 89% fusion rate was assessed in a subset of IFD participants. There were no intraoperative device issues or re-operations in the IFD group, and only one healed and non-symptomatic spinous process fracture observed within 24 months. Conclusion: Despite a low number of participants in the IFD group, the study demonstrated successful two-year safety and clinical outcomes for the IFD with significant operation-related advantages compared to surgical decompression. Keywords: lumbar spinal stenosis, surgical decompression, posterior lateral arthrodesis, patient reported outcomes, minimally invasive spine, interspinous fixation device Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is characterized by pain or abnormal sensations in the lower back, legs, buttocks, thighs and feet. These sensations are aggravated by walking (neurogenic claudication) and relieved by forward flexion, sitting, or recumbency. LSS can be congenital or more -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology