Abstract:Environmental degradation is frequently cited as one of the eminent issues in the modern era. To limit environmental degradation, prior literature discerns several macroeconomic, socio-economic, and institutional factors that affect environmental degradation. However, the relationship between geopolitical risk and environmental degradation is understudied in the previous literature. To fill this gap, the inquiry at hand aims to scrutinize the influence of geopolitical risk on environmental degradation for E7 countries while controlling the effect of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, and GDP. Further, we utilize both the ecological footprint and CO2 emissions as proxies of environmental degradation and employ second-generation panel methods for robust findings. In addition to this, the present study uses augmented mean group (AMG) estimator to provide long-run relationship among the selected variables. The findings from the AMG estimator expound that there exists environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) for E7 countries. Moreover, renewable energy ameliorates environmental quality because it plunges both ecological footprint and CO2 emissions. On the contrary, non-renewable energy consumption escalates both ecological footprint and CO2 emissions. Finally, geopolitical risk tends to decrease CO2 emissions as well as ecological footprint. Our findings deduce a few policy implications to replenish environmental quality. For instance, the share of renewables in the energy mix should be surged to ameliorate the environmental quality. Further, to control both the geopolitical risk and environmental degradation at the same time, policymakers should put forward reforms and initiatives (e.g., policies to escalate R&D, technological innovations, and tax exemptions on imports of renewables) that can help to improve environmental quality without affecting geopolitical risk. At times of low geopolitical risk, environmental degradation will surge; therefore, the rate of environmental control taxes should be increased by the policymakers.

Do the grey clouds of geopolitical risk and political globalization exacerbate environmental degradation? Evidence from resource-rich countries

Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries

Geo-political Risks, Uncertainty, Financial Development, Renewable Energy, and Carbon Intensity: Empirical Evidence from Countries at High Geo-Political Risks

Effects of geopolitical risk on environmental sustainability and the moderating role of environmental policy stringency

Heterogeneous effects of economic policy uncertainty and foreign direct investment on environmental quality: cross-country evidence

How does geopolitical risk affect carbon emissions?: An empirical study from the perspective of mineral resources extraction in OECD countries

Can sustainable resource management overcome geopolitical risk?

How economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk affect environmental pollution: does renewable energy consumption matter?

Natural resources abundance, economic globalization, and carbon emissions: Advancing sustainable development agenda

Is Geopolitical Risk Powerful Enough to Affect Carbon Dioxide Emissions? Evidence from China

The effect of geopolitical risk on carbon emissions: influence mechanisms and heterogeneity analyzed using evidence from China

Energy transition, natural resource consumption and environmental degradation: The role of geopolitical risk in sustainable development

The impact of financial development and globalization on environmental quality: evidence from South Asian economies

Revisiting the impact of energy consumption, foreign direct investment, and geopolitical risk on CO2 emissions: Comparing developed and developing countries

Achieving environmental sustainability goals through capitalizing on renewable energy channels: Role of green finance, resources productivity and geopolitical situation in the MENA region

Valuing the greenhouse effect of political risks: the global case

Does globalization and financial sector development affect environmental quality? A panel data investigation for the Middle East and North African countries

Interaction among geopolitical risk, trade openness, economic growth, carbon emissions and Its implication on climate change in india

Does geopolitical risk escalate CO2 emissions? Evidence from the BRICS countries

The impact of globalization and financial development on environmental quality: evidence from selected countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

Effect of income, energy consumption, energy prices, political stability, and geopolitical risk on the environment: Evidence from GCC countries by novel quantile-based methods