Different Phenomena in Magnetic/Electrical Properties of Co(II) and Ni(II) Isomorphous MOFs

Shi-Fen Li,Quan Wang,Ye-Ping Li,Xiao Geng,LiJia Zhao,Mei He,Lin Du,Qi-Hua Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00574
IF: 4.1
2021-03-26
ACS Omega
Abstract:Two unprecedented and stable metal–organic frameworks, {[Co<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>(L)(OH)]·2.5H<sub>2</sub>O·0.5DMF}<i><sub>n</sub></i> (<b>1</b>) and {[Ni<sub>2</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>(L)(OH)]·1.75H<sub>2</sub>O}<i><sub>n</sub></i> (<b>2</b>), have been synthesized (H<sub>3</sub>L = 5-(5-carboxy-pyridin-3-yloxy)-isophthalic acid, DMF = <i>N</i>,<i>N</i>-dimethylformamide). Structural analysis shows that <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> are heteronuclear isomorphous, possessing a three-dimensional (3D) (4,8)-connected flu/fluorite topological framework formed through the interconnection of tetranuclear butterfly {M<sub>4</sub>(COO)<sub>6</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>} clusters and the ligands. Although the frameworks of these two compounds are similar, their magnetic properties are different. Compound <b>1</b> exhibits an antiferromagnetic interaction in the high-temperature region, while <b>2</b> shows a weak ferromagnetic interaction in the whole-temperature region. Furthermore, considering the presence of hydroxyl groups and water molecules in the frameworks, we tested their proton conductivity. The efficient proton transfer pathway in the framework endowed <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> with excellent proton conductivities of 9.07 × 10<sup>–5</sup> and 1.29 × 10<sup>–4</sup> S·cm<sup>–1</sup> at 363 K and 98% relative humidity (RH), respectively.This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?