Abstract:Key PointsObservational and experimental studies dating back to the 1950s demonstrate that mammals spontaneously help distressed conspecifics. Research emphasizes the untrained, unrewarded nature of this behaviour, which is also biased towards familiar individuals, thus arguing against explanations that are exclusively based on associative learning or conditioning.The perception–action model extends an existing motor theory on overlapping representations to emotional phenomena; it states that observers who attend to a target's state understand and 'feel into' it through personal distributed representations of the target, the state and the situation. Easily observed manifestations of this mechanism are emotional contagion and motor mimicry, which have been demonstrated in many animals. In cognitive forms of empathy, the same representations are accessed from the top-down.Experiments on two common mammalian expressions of empathy — the consolation of distressed individuals and spontaneous assistance to those in need — support the crucial role of caught distress and arousal because these behaviours are suppressed by anti-anxiety medication and engage the same neuropeptide system that supports social attachment.The Russian-doll model seeks to arrange forms of empathy into layers that are built on top of each other — with the layers ranging from emotional contagion to more cognitive forms of empathy — in a functionally integrated whole based on perception–action processes. Perspective-taking is well developed in some non-human species, as manifested by theory-of-mind and targeted helping.One can segregate emotional and cognitive empathy (as well as felt and observed states) in the brains of observers, but all forms require some initial access to the observer's distributed, shared, personal representations of the target's state. At least in the initial phase of processing, this access helps to decode the target's state and provide subsequent processing with content and meaning, even if the shared state is not experienced, or is incomplete or inaccurate.Empathic pain does not usually include the peripheral sensation of the target's injury, but it can include sensory information when the stimuli and task instructions emphasize the specific nature of the feeling at the location of the injury.

A biological perspective on empathy

A neurobehavioral evolutionary perspective on the mechanisms underlying empathy

The expression of empathy in human's closest relatives, bonobos and chimpanzees: current and future directions

The emergence of empathy: A developmental neuroscience perspective

A developmental perspective on the neural bases of human empathy

A Social-Neuroscience Perspective on Empathy

The Social Neuroscience of Empathy

Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases.

The Empathic Brain of Psychopaths: From Social Science to Neuroscience in Empathy

Mammalian empathy: behavioural manifestations and neural basis

Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas

Empathizing: neurocognitive developmental mechanisms and individual differences

An Integrated View of Empathy: Psychology, Philosophy, and Neuroscience

The Neural Substrate of Human Empathy: Effects of Perspective-taking and Cognitive Appraisal

A Critical Reflection and Forward Perspective on Empathy and Natural Language Processing

The Lifespan Development and Developmental Neural Basis of Empathy

The evolution and development of the uniquely human capacity for emotional awareness: a synthesis of comparative anatomical, cognitive, neurocomputational, and evolutionary psychological perspectives

Is the Putative Mirror Neuron System Associated with Empathy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Friends or Foes: Is Empathy Necessary for Moral Behavior?

Feedback matters: EEG correlates of empathy involved in the naturalistic communication of emotions