Crystal Structures of EF-G–Ribosome Complexes Trapped in Intermediate States of Translocation
Jie Zhou,Laura Lancaster,John Paul Donohue,Harry F. Noller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1236086
IF: 56.9
2013-01-01
Science
Abstract:Introduction: One of the most critical and complex steps of protein synthesis is the coupled translocation of mRNA and tRNAs (mRNA and tRNAs) through the ribosome, catalyzed by the guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) elongation factor EF-G. Although several of the main steps have been identified, the underlying molecular mechanisms of translocation are poorly understood. A central question is how structural rearrangements in the ribosome are coupled to movement of mRNA and tRNA. Methods: We trapped and crystallized complexes of Thermus thermophilus ribosomes bound with EF-G, mRNA, and tRNA, using the antibiotic fusidic acid (which prevents release of EF-G after GTP hydrolysis) or the nonhydrolyzable GTP analog GDPNP, in intermediate states of translocation. Their crystal structures were determined to resolutions from 3.5 to 4.1 Å. Results: The structures of the fusidic acid complex (Fus) and two GDPNP complexes (GDPNP-I and GDPNP-II) reveal conformational changes occurring during intermediate states of translocation, including large-scale (15° to 18°) rotation of the 30 S subunit head and 3° to 5° rotation of the 30 S body. In all complexes, the tRNA acceptor end has moved from the 50 S subunit P site to the 50 S E site, while the anticodon stem loop (ASL) and mRNA move with the head of the 30 S subunit to positions between the P and E sites, forming chimeric pe*/E intermediate states. The elongated, mobile domain IV of EF-G moves to contact the head of the 30 S subunit and the backbone of the mRNA. Two universally conserved bases of 16 S rRNA that intercalate between bases of the mRNA may act as “pawls” of a translocational ratchet. In the GDPNP complexes, structuring of the conserved switch loop I segment, which was disordered in previous structures, completes the cage that encloses GDPNP and fixes the relative geometry of EF-G domains I, III, and V. In the Fus complex, the position of fusidic acid overlaps that of switch loop I, stabilizing contacts between domains I and III that are normally made by the structured switch loop. Conclusion: Our structures capture intermediate states of the rate-limiting step of translocation, in which movement of the tRNA ASL and mRNA is coupled to rotational movement of the 30 S subunit head. Slippage of the translational reading frame during reverse rotation of the head during translocation may be prevented by intercalation of bases C1397 and A1503 of 16 S rRNA, which project from the body of the 30 S subunit, between mRNA bases. The antibiotic fusidic acid appears to stabilize binding of EF-G to the ribosome in the GDP state by mimicking the structure of the conserved core of switch loop I of EF-G in the GTP state.