Field Assessment of Biochar Interactions With Chemical and Biological N Fertilization in Pointed White Cabbage

Raúl Castejón‐del Pino,María L. Cayuela,María Sánchez‐García,Jose A. Siles,Miguel A. Sánchez‐Monedero
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70006
2024-10-12
GCB Bioenergy
Abstract:This study assessed the agronomic and environmental impacts of applying (1) biochar‐based N fertilizer and coapplication of biochar with either (2) N‐fixing bacteria or (3) split synthetic N fertilizer. These treatments were compared to the sole application of either N‐fixing bacteria or split synthetic N fertilizer. The biochar‐based fertilizer showed similar agronomic performance to synthetic fertilizer but significantly enhanced the activity of N‐fixing bacteria and reduced the global warming potential, primarily due to the increase in soil organic C content. The interaction of biochar with mineral fertilization has attracted attention as a strategy to reduce N losses and enhance nitrogen use efficiency. In this study, we investigated the coapplication of biochar with two optimized fertilization strategies based on split urea and a microbial inoculant (Azospirillum brasilense) in a commercial pointed white cabbage crop. Additionally, we evaluated a third optimized N fertilization alternative, a biochar‐based fertilizer (BBF) enriched in plant‐available N, which was developed from the same biochar. We assessed environmental impacts such as greenhouse gasses (GHG) and NH3 emissions, yield‐scaled N2O emissions, and global warming potential (GWP). Additionally, we evaluated agronomical outcomes such as crop yield, plant N, and chlorophyll concentration. Moreover, we examined the N‐fixing gene's total and relative abundance (nifH and nifH/16S). Biochar and BBF exhibited similar crop yield, GHG, and NH3 emissions compared to split applications of the synthetic fertilizer. The main difference was associated with the higher soil C sequestration in biochar and BBF treatments that reduced the associated GWP of these fertilization strategies. Finally, biochar favored the activity of the N‐fixing bacteria spread, compared to the sole application of bacteria and BBF demonstrated a promoting effect in the soil's total abundance of natural N‐fixing bacteria.
energy & fuels,agronomy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?