Analytical Examination of the Nutritional Status of Drinking Water Resources: A First Case Application in Africa
Johnson C. Agbasi Johnbosco C. Egbueri Anwar A. Alghamdi Varish Ahmad Salwa Al-Thawadi Mohd Yawar Ali Khan Sani I. Abba Victor C. Eze a Department of Geology,Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University,Uli,Nigeriab Research Management Office (RMO),Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University,Anambra,Nigeriac Health Information Technology Department,The Applied College,King Abdulaziz University,Jeddah,Saudi Arabiad Pharmacovigilance and Medication Safety Unit,Centre of Research Excellence for Drug Research and Pharmaceutical Industries,King Abdulaziz University,Jeddah,Saudi Arabiae Department of Biology,College of Science,University of Bahrain,Sakir,Bahrainf Department of Hydrogeology,Faculty of Earth Sciences,King Abdulaziz University,Jeddah,Saudi Arabiag Department of Civil Engineering,Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University,Al Khobar,Saudi Arabiah Department of Chemistry,University of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences,Umuagwo,Nigeria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2024.2426041
2024-11-13
Analytical Letters
Abstract:Water quality assessment is crucial for public and ecosystem health, yet traditional approaches often overlook the nutritional aspects of drinking water. This study introduces the Drinking Water Nutritional Quality Index (DWNQI) to Africa, presenting its first application in the continent. The research evaluated the nutritional status of drinking water resources in semi-urban areas of Southeast Nigeria, shifting from a contaminant-focused paradigm. Water samples were strategically collected from various drinking water sources. Five key elements (Na + , Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ , Mn 2+ , and Zn 2+ ) that play crucial roles in both human health and environmental processes were considered. The DWNQI model revealed a concerning nutritional trend, with DWNQI scores ranging from 9.76 to 78.54 (average 32.02). The analysis showed that 73.33% of samples fell within the "Poor" category, 13.33% in "Marginal," 6.67% in "Fair," and 6.67% in "Good" categories, with no samples reaching the excellent range, indicating a low nutritional water quality trend in the area. Sensitivity analysis reveal that Mg 2+ and Ca 2+ exerted the most influence on the DWNQI scores for the studied water samples. Removal of Mg 2+ from the index resulted in a 23.77% decrease in the average DWNQI score, while removal of Ca 2+ led to a 23.42% decrease. Key recommendations include implementing targeted mineral enrichment programs and developing public health initiatives to address potential mineral deficiencies. This research contributes to environmental sustainability and public health by providing a new perspective of water quality, potentially informing water management policies and guiding public health interventions in African settings and beyond.
chemistry, analytical