Dispersal of Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and toxic metals: a probable influence of inorganic fluoride and ionic strength in the Shiqi River Basin of Nanjing City, South-Eastern China

Muhammad Ibrahim,Yiping Li,Xiaolin Zhu,Yaning Wang,Yan Chunmin,Hafsat Alhassan Danjaji,Abdulhakim Wagini Hassan,Adam Umar Jibo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-03085-6
IF: 4.3
2024-12-05
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
Abstract:Due to increased global demand for electricity and the negative consequences of non-renewable energy sources, the photovoltaic solar power industry is predicted to overtake coal as the world's primary energy source by 2025. However, the production of photovoltaic panels contributes to the occurrence of toxic metals (TMs), inorganic fluoride, and PFASs in freshwaters, raising environmental and public health concerns. In order to determine any potential synergistic or antagonistic interactions as well as their combined impact on water quality, this study analyzes the occurrence and spatial patterns of TMs and two prominent PFAS in the Shiqi River Basin (SRB) of Nanjing City, South-Eastern China. As such, the influence of inorganic fluoride and ionic strength on the geographical distribution of the compounds under investigation was assessed. The findings showed that while the percentages of the chosen TMs, including lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), and arsenic (As), were 58.33, 83.33, and 66.67%, respectively, all 12 of the study sites had 100% detection rates for PFAS and inorganic fluoride. Higher concentrations of the two prominent PFAS compounds (PFOS and PFOA) and inorganic fluoride were found upstream of the SRB. In contrast, their moderate amounts were noticed midstream of the river basin under study. The amount of inorganic fluoride and ionic strength in the SRB did not significantly show an effect on the occurrence and distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid ( R 2 = 0.0135 and 0.0099; P < 0.05) and perfluorooctanoic acid ( R 2 = 0.0197 and 0.1213; P As > Pb. Correlation coefficients revealed that the ionic strength and inorganic fluoride content were not the only contributing factors that demonstrated a non/negative linear relationship with PFOS and PFOA; other environmental factors, including pH changes, ammonia, and nitrate levels, may also have an effect on the frequency and geographic layout of PFAS compounds as well as TMs in SRB. Eventually, the level of the two prominent PFAS compounds in the SRB was below the recommended 70 ng/L threshold.
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?