Abstract:We previously demonstrated that during the preparation of a large-scale saccadic eye movement, defining features of the eye movement target (i.e., its orientation) are anticipated in pre-saccadic foveal vision (Kroell & Rolfs, 2022). In this Research Advance, we show that the conspicuity of orientation information at the saccade target location influences the magnitude and time course of foveal enhancement. As in our previous study, observers prepared a saccade to a peripheral orientation signal (the target) while monitoring the appearance of a second orientation signal (the probe) in their pre-saccadic center of gaze. The probe appeared in 50% of trials and either had the same orientation as the target (congruent) or a different orientation (incongruent). In the current study, we manipulated the opacity of the target against the 1/f background noise in four logarithmic steps from 25% to 90%. An increase in opacity translated to an increase in luminance contrast and the signal-to-noise ratio of orientation information within the target region. We made three main observations: First, foveal Hit Rates for target-congruent and incongruent probes decreased as target opacity increased, presumably since attention was increasingly drawn to the target the more salient it became. Crucially, foveal enhancement defined as the difference between congruent and incongruent Hit Rates increased with opacity. Second, the time course of foveal enhancement appeared to show an oscillatory pattern that was particularly pronounced at higher target opacities. Interestingly, the temporal frequency of these oscillations corresponded to the frequency range typically associated with neural feedback signaling. Third, unlike the difference in Hit Rates, the difference in False Alarm Rates did not vary with opacity. Instead, reverse correlations suggest that at higher target opacities, False Alarms were increasingly triggered by signal, that is, by incidental orientation information in the foveal noise. Beyond providing new mechanistic insights into active foveal processing, these findings are relevant for researchers planning to adapt our paradigm to study related questions. Presenting the saccade target at a high signal-to-noise ratio appears beneficial as congruency effects, especially when time-resolved, are most robustly detectable.

Ultra-fine resolution of pre-saccadic attention in the fovea

Presaccadic attention sharpens visual acuity

Transient perceptual enhancements resulting from selective shifts of exogenous attention in the central fovea

Modulations of foveal vision associated with microsaccade preparation

Selective attention within the foveola

Foveal action for the control of extrafoveal vision

Presaccadic attention depends on eye movement direction and is related to V1 cortical magnification

Presaccadic Attention Enhances and Reshapes the Contrast Sensitivity Function Differentially around the Visual Field

Eccentricity-Dependent Saccadic Reaction Time: The Roles of Foveal Magnification and Attentional Orienting

Different temporal dynamics of foveal and peripheral visual processing during fixation

Presaccadic attentional shifts are not modulated by saccade amplitude

The magnitude and time course of pre-saccadic foveal prediction depend on the conspicuity of the saccade target

Flexibility of foveal attention during ocular pursuit.

Microsaccadic suppression of peripheral perceptual detection performance as a function of foveated visual image appearance

Fast Feature- and Category-Related Parafoveal Previewing Support Free Visual Exploration

Attention for Saccades and Foveal Pursuit is Shared

Fast feature- and category-related parafoveal previewing support natural visual exploration

Trans-Saccadic Integration for Object Recognition Peters out with Pre-Saccadic Object Eccentricity As Target-Directed Saccades Become More Saliency-Driven

Selective spatial enhancement: Attentional spotlight size impacts spatial but not temporal perception

Visual Attention in The Fovea and The Periphery during Visual Search