Abstract:Background: Many patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) are refractory to traditional nonsurgical treatments such as intraarticular corticosteroid (CS) injection but are not yet eligible for or decline surgery. Genicular artery embolization (GAE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are emerging adjunctive or alternative minimally invasive treatments. Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) comparing CS, GAE, and RFA, for treatment of symptomatic KOA using a Markov model based on a de novo network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized control trials. Methods: CEA was conducted to compare GAE and RFA to CS using a Markov cohort state-transition model from a U.S. Medicare payer's perspective over a 4-year time horizon. The model incorporated each treatment's success and attrition rates, costs, and utility benefit. Utility benefit values were derived at short-term (0.5-3 months) and long-term (6-12 months) posttreatment follow-up from NMA of published RCTs using an outcome of improved knee pain and/or function. Analyses were conducted at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Sensitivity analyses were performed, including when simulating various cost setting scenarios (i.e., office vs hospital outpatient treatment). Results: RFA demonstrated larger treatment effect than GAE, more pronounced at short-term [standardized mean difference (SMD), -1.6688, 95% CI [-2.7806; -0.5571], p=.003] than long-term (SMD -0.3822, 95% CI [-1.9743; 1.2100], p=.64) follow-up. Across cost setting scenarios, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios relative to CS were $561-1563/QALY for GAE versus $76-429/QALY for RFA (not counting scenarios in which RFA was dominated by CS). GAE demonstrated higher cost-effectiveness probability compared to RFA (41.6-54.8% vs. 18.4-29.2%, respectively). GAE was more cost-effective than RFA when the GAE clinical success rate and post-GAE utility value exceeded 32.1-51.0% and 0.562-0.617, respectively, and when the GAE quarterly attrition rate was less than 8.8-17.4%. RFA was more cost-effective when baseline pre-treatment utility values exceeded 0.695-0.713. Neither GAE costs nor RFA costs were sensitive parameters. Conclusion: Across scenarios, GAE was consistently the most likely cost-effective treatment option compared to RFA and CS, although clinical success rates, attrition rates, and utility values impact its cost-effectiveness. Clinical Impact: GAE is likely to be more cost-effective than RFA or CS for treatment of symptomatic KOA.

Genicular artery embolisation versus sham embolisation for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised controlled trial

Genicular Artery Embolisation in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee (GENESIS 2): Protocol for a Double-Blind Randomised Sham-Controlled Trial

Transarterial Embolization of Geniculate Arteries Reduces Pain and Improves Physical Function in Knee Osteoarthritis-A Prospective Cohort Study

Geniculate Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis Improves Pain and Function: A Systematic Review

Reduction in Synovitis Following Genicular Artery Embolization in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Ultrasound and MRI Study

Genicular Artery Embolization for Treatment of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis-2-Year Outcomes from a Prospective IDE Trial

Selective Genicular Artery Embolization in the Management of Osteoarthritic Knee Pain—A Narrative Review

Selective embolization of genicular arteries after total knee arthroplasty with persistent synovitis and pain

Genicular Artery Embolization: Embolic Material and Imaging Review

Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Arterial Embolisation for Chronic Knee Pain: Mild-to-Moderate Versus Severe Knee Osteoarthritis

Genicular Artery Embolization, Radiofrequency Ablation, and Corticosteroid Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Randomized Clinical Trial Data

A New Tool for the Management of Refractory Osteoarthritis-Related Knee Pain

Effectiveness comparison of genicular nerve ablation for knee osteoarthritic versus post-total knee arthroplasty pain

Comparative effectiveness of acupuncture in sham-controlled trials for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Genicular Artery embolisation in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee (GENESIS) Using Permanent Microspheres: Long-Term Results

Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS)

Efficacy and safety of Postoperative Intravenous Parecoxib sodium Followed by ORal CElecoxib (PIPFORCE) post-total knee arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: a study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group trial.

Effectiveness of the Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Genicular Nerves in Patients with Chronic Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study

Laser Acupuncture for Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials

Different kinds of acupuncture treatments for knee osteoarthritis: a multicentre, randomized controlled trial

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of the genicular nerves in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis knee pain