Performance of Three Mortality Prediction Scores and Evaluation of Important Determinants in Eight Pediatric Intensive Care Units in China

Zhengzheng Zhang,Xiangyuan Huang,Ying Wang,Ying Li,Hongjun Miao,Chenmei Zhang,Guoquan Pan,Yucai Zhang,Xiaodong Zhu,Weiming Chen,Juanzhen Li,Dongni Su,Yanlong Bi,Zhenjie Chen,Bingxin Jin,Huijie Miao,Xiangmei Kong,Ye Cheng,Yang Chen,Gangfeng Yan,Weili Yan,Guoping Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00522

IF: 3.569

2020-09-08

Frontiers in Pediatrics

Abstract:<span><strong>Background:</strong> The mortality prediction scores were widely used in pediatric intensive care units. However, their performances were unclear in Chinese patients and there were also no reports based on large sample sizes in China. This study aims to evaluate the performances of three existing severity assessment scores in predicting PICU mortality and to identify important determinants.<strong>Methods:</strong> This prospective observational cohort study was carried out in eight multidisciplinary, tertiary-care PICUs of teaching hospitals in China. All eligible patients admitted to the PICUs between Aug 1, 2016, and Jul 31, 2017, were consecutively enrolled, among whom 3,957 were included for analysis. We calculated PCIS, PRISM IV, and PELOD-2 scores based on patient data collected in the first 24 h after PICU admission. The in-hospital mortality was defined as all-cause death within 3 months after admission. The discrimination of mortality was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) and calibrated using the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.<strong>Results:</strong> A total of 4,770 eligible patients were recruited (median age 18.2 months, overall mortality rate 4.7%, median length of PICU stay 6 days), and 3,957 participants were included in the analysis. The AUC (95% confidence intervals, CI) were 0.74 (0.71–0.78), 0.76 (0.73–0.80), and 0.80 (0.77–0.83) for PCIS, PRISM IV, and PELOD-2, respectively. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test gave a chi-square of 3.16 for PCIS, 2.16 for PRISM IV and 4.81 for PELOD-2 (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.19). Cox regression identified five predictors from the items of scores better associated with higher death risk, with a C-index of 0.83 (95%CI 0.79–0.86), including higher platelet (HR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.59–2.16), invasive ventilation (HR = 1.40, 1.26–1.55), pupillary light reflex (HR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.22–1.42) scores, lower pH (HR 0.89, 0.84–0.94), and extreme PaO₂ (HR 2.60, 95% CI 1.61–4.19 for the 1st quantile vs. 4th quantile) scores.<strong>Conclusions:</strong> Performances of the three scores in predicting PICU mortality are comparable, and five predictors were identified with better prediction to PICU mortality in Chinese patients.</span>

pediatrics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to address the following issues:

1. **Evaluate the performance of three existing critical illness scoring systems in predicting mortality risk among pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients in China**: The paper compares the predictive effectiveness of the PCIS, PRISM IV, and PELOD-2 scoring systems. The study finds that these three scoring systems perform comparably in predicting the mortality risk of Chinese PICU patients, but their performance is not as ideal as previously reported in studies from the United States and Europe.

2. **Identify important determinants of mortality risk**: By analyzing the various indicators within these scoring systems, the study identifies five predictors significantly associated with the mortality risk of Chinese PICU patients: platelet count, invasive ventilation, pupillary light reflex, pH value, and PaO₂ level.

Overall, this paper evaluates the applicability and accuracy of three commonly used scoring systems in Chinese pediatric intensive care units through a large-scale multicenter study and attempts to find mortality risk predictors that are more suitable for the Chinese context.