Abstract:Background: Individuals with severe to profound and multiple intellectual disability (S-PMID) tend to function at the earlier stages of communication development. Variable and highly individual means of communicating may present challenges to the adults providing support in everyday life. The current study aimed to examine the communication interface between students with S-PMID and educational staff. Method: An in-depth, observational study of dyadic interaction in a class within the secondary part of a special school was conducted. The designated educational level was Key Stage 3 under the National Curriculum of England, which is typically for children from age 11 to 14 years attending a state school. There were four student-teacher dyads in the class. The students had multiple impairments with severely limited communication skills. Video capture of dyadic interaction was conducted during five English lessons and sampled to 2.5 min per dyad per lesson. The video footage was transcribed into standard orthography, detailing the vocal and non-vocal aspects. A coding framework guided by the principles of structural-functional linguistics was used to determine the nature of dyadic interaction, comprising linguistic moves, functions and communicative modalities. The relative contributions of student and teacher to the interaction were examined. Results: Significant differences were found between the students and educational staff on the majority of the measures. The teachers dominated the interaction, occupying significantly more turns than the students. Teacher turns contained significantly more initiations and follow-up moves than the students, who used more response moves. Teacher communication mainly served the functions of requesting and information giving. Feedback and scripted functions were also significantly greater among teacher turns, with only limited occurrence among the students. Self- or shared-expression was greatest among the students. The modalities of speech, touch, singing and objects were used by the teachers for the purpose of communication, whereas vocalisation and gesture were used by the students. Conclusions: Despite differences in the availability of communication skills, both student and teacher were able to make their respective contributions to the interaction during classroom activity. Features of the student-teacher interface retained critical features seen in studies of more able individuals with intellectual disability. Scaffolding provided by teachers appears to be relevant to the communicative contributions of individuals functioning at the earliest stages of communication. The coding framework based on structural-functional linguistics provides some new potential for examining and enhancing the communication interface between individuals with S-PMID and the people who support them.

Contribution of an academic writing intervention on the micro-macrostructure skills of students with intellectual disability

Outcomes of a Creative Ability–Based Intervention: Advancing Independence in Learners With Severe Intellectual Disability

A College Entrance Essay Exam Intervention for Students With High-Incidence Disabilities and Struggling Writers

Changes in DTI Diffusivity and fMRI Connectivity Cluster Coefficients for Students with and without Specific Learning Disabilities In Written Language: Brain's Response to Writing Instruction

An Interventive Collaborative Scaffolded Approach with a Writing Center On ESL Students’ Academic Writing

Promoting Strategic Writing by Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities: A Report of Three Case Studies

Macro- and micro-developmental changes in analytical writing of bilinguals from elementary to higher education

The Writing Achievement, Metacognitive Knowledge of Writing and Motivation of Middle-School Students with Learning Difficulties

Integrated Practice of Metacognitive Strategies And Second Language Writing

Using a brief experimental analysis for writing speed intervention identification

The impact of three types of writing intervention on students’ writing quality

The Academic Writing Skills Programme: A model for technology-enhanced, blended delivery of an academic writing programme

Embedded academic writing support for nursing students with English as a second language

Examination of the communication interface between students with severe to profound and multiple intellectual disability and educational staff during structured teaching sessions

Aptitude-treatment interactions revisited: effect of metacognitive intervention on subtypes of written expression in elementary school students

The Impact of Writing Through Integrated Skills Intervention on English Students’ Writing Skills: Focus on Vocabulary and Grammar

Influencing language mindsets and English writing competence through an EAP program: A longitudinal study with latent transition analysis

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reading and Writing Interventions for Students with Disorders of Intellectual Development

A Personal Narrative Intervention for Adults With Autism and Intellectual Disability

The Impact of Metacognitive Strategies on Jordanian EFL Learners’ Writing Performance

Writing Interventions for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Research Synthesis